Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiang Wu 0016
dblp:81/6077-16
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-2025-6763ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 83% Performance modeling and evaluation · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › instruction set architecture
cross-ISA translation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary Translators · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › binary translation
dynamic binary translation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary Translators · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary Translators · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary Translators · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
trace-driven simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary Translators · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mathematical modeling · 0.8black-box unit testing · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | An Instruction Inflation Analyzing Framework for Dynamic Binary TranslatorsabstractDynamic binary translators (DBTs) are widely used to migrate applications between different instruction set architectures (ISAs). Despite extensive research to improve DBT performance, noticeable overhead remains, preventing near-native performance, especially when translating from complex instruction set computer (CISC) to reduced instruction set computer (RISC). For computational workloads, the main overhead stems from translated code quality. Experimental data show that state-of-the-art DBT products have dynamic code inflation of at least 1.46. This indicates that on average, more than 1.46 host instructions are needed to emulate one guest instruction. Worse, inflation closely correlates with translated code quality. However, the detailed sources of instruction inflation remain unclear. To understand the sources of inflation, we present Deflater , an instruction inflation analysis framework comprising a mathematical model, a collection of black-box unit tests called BenchMIAOes , and a trace-based simulator called InflatSim . The mathematical model calculates overall inflation based on the inflation of individual instructions and translation block optimizations. BenchMIAOes extract model parameters from DBTs without accessing DBT source code. InflatSim implements the model and uses the extracted parameters from BenchMIAOes to simulate a given DBT’s behavior. Deflater is a valuable tool to guide DBT analysis and improvement. Using Deflater, we simulated inflation for three state-of-the-art CISC-to-RISC DBTs: ExaGear, Rosetta2, and LATX, with inflation errors of 5.63%, 5.15%, and 3.44%, respectively for SPEC CPU 2017, gaining insights into these commercial DBTs. Deflater also efficiently models inflation for the open source DBT QEMU and suggests optimizations that can substantially reduce inflation. Implementing the suggested optimizations confirms Deflater’s effective guidance, with 4.65% inflation error, and gains 5.47x performance improvement. Benyi Xie, Chenghao Yan, Sicheng Tao, Xinyu Li 0010, Yanzhi Lan, Xiang Wu 0016, Fuxin Zhang |
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. | 8 |