Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

F. A. Gay

dblp:81/6254 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › mutation testing
fault injection
0.011978
Evaluation of Maintenance Software in Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1978
Software testing
mutation testing
0.011978
Evaluation of Maintenance Software in Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1978
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time software
0.011978
Evaluation of Maintenance Software in Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical estimation · 0.0fault injection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 Evaluation of Maintenance Software in Real-Time Systems
abstract
Statistical theory can be applied to data collected by physical fault insertion of small, random fault samples to estimate the critical parameters of software responsible for fault recovery, detection, and resolution in real-time systems. Estimates of the critical parameters can be used to determine if system reliability objectives are satisfied. This method of software evaluation, modified because of the impracticality of selecting and physically inserting truly random fault samples, was verified against a diagnostic/ Trouble Locating Program (TLP) whose critical parameters were known and was then used to evaluate and optimize a new diagnostic/ TLP program of unknown quality. Empirical evidence indicates that there is a close correlation between system performance against real faults and against the selected subset of real faults used for sampling.
F. A. Gay
IEEE Trans. Computers1