Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael A. Iverson

dblp:82/1484 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 42% Parallel and multicore computing · 34% Electronic design automation · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
execution time prediction
0.011999
Statistical Prediction of Task Execution Times through Analytic Benchmarking for Scheduling in a Heterogeneous Environment · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
runtime scheduling
0.011996
Run-Time Statistical Estimation of Task Execution Times for Heterogeneous Distributed Computing · HPDC 1996
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.011996
Run-Time Statistical Estimation of Task Execution Times for Heterogeneous Distributed Computing · HPDC 1996
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling
dynamic scheduling
0.011999
Statistical Prediction of Task Execution Times through Analytic Benchmarking for Scheduling in a Heterogeneous Environment · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999
Performance modeling and evaluation › statistical analysis
statistical estimation
0.011996
Run-Time Statistical Estimation of Task Execution Times for Heterogeneous Distributed Computing · HPDC 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical estimation · 0.0code profiling · 0.0analytic benchmarking · 0.0nonparametric regression · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Statistical Prediction of Task Execution Times through Analytic Benchmarking for Scheduling in a Heterogeneous Environment
abstract
In this paper, a method for estimating task execution times is presented in order to facilitate dynamic scheduling in a heterogeneous metacomputing environment. Execution time is treated as a random variable and is statistically estimated from past observations. This method predicts the execution time as a function of several parameters of the input data and does not require any direct information about the algorithms used by the tasks or the architecture of the machines. Techniques based upon the concept of analytic benchmarking/code profiling are used to characterize the performance differences between machines, allowing observations from dissimilar machines to be used when making a prediction. Experimental results are presented which use actual execution time data gathered from 16 heterogeneous machines.
Michael A. Iverson, Füsun Özgüner, Lee C. Potter
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1996 Run-Time Statistical Estimation of Task Execution Times for Heterogeneous Distributed Computing
abstract
An efficient run time, statistical scheme for estimating the execution time of a task is presented, in order to facilitate run time matching and scheduling in a distributed heterogeneous computing environment. This scheme is based upon a nonparametric regression technique, where the execution time estimate for a task is computed from past observations. Furthermore, this technique is able to compensate for different parameters upon which the execution time depends, and does not require any knowledge of the architecture of the target machine. It is also able to make accurate predictions when erroneous data is present in the set of observations, and has been experimentally shown to produce estimates with very low error even with few past values from which to calculate a new estimate.
Michael A. Iverson, Füsun Özgüner, Gregory J. Follen
HPDC1