Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeffery Kline

dblp:82/216 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0009-2762-9654ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 78% Optimization for machine learning · 22%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 51% Network measurement and analytics · 28% Network management and operations · 21%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.712023
Efficient Discrete Multi Marginal Optimal Transport Regularization · ICLR 2023
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.712023
Efficient Discrete Multi Marginal Optimal Transport Regularization · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
efficient attention
0.612022
Multi Resolution Analysis (MRA) for Approximate Self-Attention · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › multi-scale representation
multiresolution analysis
0.612022
Multi Resolution Analysis (MRA) for Approximate Self-Attention · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › efficient transformer
self-attention approximation
0.612022
Multi Resolution Analysis (MRA) for Approximate Self-Attention · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.612022
Multi Resolution Analysis (MRA) for Approximate Self-Attention · ICML 2022
Internet architecture and protocols › world wide web › web protocols
HTTP
0.112017
On the structure and characteristics of user agent string · Internet Measurement Conference 2017
Network management and operations › fault management › fault diagnosis
network fault diagnosis
0.012002
A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies · Internet Measurement Workshop 2002
Network measurement and analytics › anomaly detection
traffic anomaly detection
0.012002
A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies · Internet Measurement Workshop 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wavelets · 0.6sparsity patterns · 0.6multiresolution analysis · 0.6low-rank approximation · 0.6longitudinal analysis · 0.3large-scale log analysis · 0.3wavelet filter · 0.0signal analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Efficient Discrete Multi Marginal Optimal Transport Regularization
Ronak Mehta, Jeffery Kline, Vishnu Suresh Lokhande, Glenn Fung
ICLR2
2022 Multi Resolution Analysis (MRA) for Approximate Self-Attention
abstract
Transformers have emerged as a preferred model for many tasks in natural langugage processing and vision. Recent efforts on training and deploying Transformers more efficiently have identified many strategies to approximate the self-attention matrix, a key module in a Transformer architecture. Effective ideas include various prespecified sparsity patterns, low-rank basis expansions and combinations thereof. In this paper, we revisit classical Multiresolution Analysis (MRA) concepts such as Wavelets, whose potential value in this setting remains underexplored thus far. We show that simple approximations based on empirical feedback and design choices informed by modern hardware and implementation challenges, eventually yield a MRA-based approach for self-attention with an excellent performance profile across most criteria of interest. We undertake an extensive set of experiments and demonstrate that this multi-resolution scheme outperforms most efficient self-attention proposals and is favorable for both short and long sequences. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/mlpen/mra-attention}.
Zhanpeng Zeng, Sourav Pal, Jeffery Kline, Glenn Fung
ICML3
2019 Properties of the d-dimensional earth mover's problem
Jeffery Kline
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2019 Geometric search for Hadamard matrices
Jeffery Kline
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2017 On the structure and characteristics of user agent string
abstract
User agent (UA) strings transmitted during HTTP transactions convey client system configuration details to ensure that content returned by a server is appropriate for the requesting host. As such, analysis of UA strings and their structure offers a unique perspective on active client systems in the Internet and when tracked longitudinally, offers a perspective on the nature of system and configuration dynamics. In this paper, we describe our study of UA string characteristics. Our work is based on analyzing a unique corpus of over 1B UA strings collected over a period of 2 years by comScore. We begin by analyzing the general characteristics of UA strings, focusing on the most prevalent strings and dynamic behaviors. We identify the top 10 most popular User Agents, which account for 26% of total daily volume. These strings describe the expected instances of popular platforms such as Microsoft, Apple and Google. We then report on the characteristics of low-volume UA strings, which has important implications for unique device identification. We show that this class of user agent generates the overwhelming majority of traffic, with between 2M and 10M instances observed each day. We show that the distribution of UA strings has temporal dependence and we show the distribution measured depends on the type of content served. Finally, we report on two large-scale UA anomalies characterized by web browsers sending false and misleading UAs in their web requests.
Jeffery Kline, Paul Barford, Aaron Cahn, Joel Sommers
Internet Measurement Conference1
2002 A signal analysis of network traffic anomalies
abstract
Identifying anomalies rapidly and accurately is critical to the efficient operation of large computer networks. Accurately characterizing important classes of anomalies greatly facilitates their identification; however, the subtleties and complexities of anomalous traffic can easily confound this process. In this paper we report results of signal analysis of four classes of network traffic anomalies: outages, flash crowds, attacks and measurement failures. Data for this study consists of IP flow and SNMP measurements collected over a six month period at the border router of a large university. Our results show that wavelet filters are quite effective at exposing the details of both ambient and anomalous traffic. Specifically, we show that a pseudo-spline filter tuned at specific aggregation levels will expose distinct characteristics of each class of anomaly. We show that an effective way of exposing anomalies is via the detection of a sharp increase in the local variance of the filtered data. We evaluate traffic anomaly signals at different points within a network based on topological distance from the anomaly source or destination. We show that anomalies can be exposed effectively even when aggregated with a large amount of additional traffic. We also compare the difference between the same traffic anomaly signals as seen in SNMP and IP flow data, and show that the more coarse-grained SNMP data can also be used to expose anomalies effectively.
Paul Barford, Jeffery Kline, David Plonka, Amos Ron
Internet Measurement Workshop2