Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sotaro Tsukizawa
dblp:82/6916
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | AutoDO: Robust AutoAugment for Biased Data With Label Noise via Scalable Probabilistic Implicit Differentiation · CVPR 2021 Deep Active Learning for Biased Datasets via Fisher Kernel Self-Supervision · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
automated augmentation policy search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AutoDO: Robust AutoAugment for Biased Data With Label Noise via Scalable Probabilistic Implicit Differentiation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AutoDO: Robust AutoAugment for Biased Data With Label Noise via Scalable Probabilistic Implicit Differentiation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Active Learning for Biased Datasets via Fisher Kernel Self-Supervision · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
learning under distribution shift |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Active Learning for Biased Datasets via Fisher Kernel Self-Supervision · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft labels · 0.5probabilistic modeling · 0.5implicit differentiation · 0.5fisher information · 0.5self-supervision · 0.4pseudo label estimation · 0.4fisher kernel · 0.4acquisition function · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | AutoDO: Robust AutoAugment for Biased Data With Label Noise via Scalable Probabilistic Implicit DifferentiationabstractAutoAugment [4] has sparked an interest in automated augmentation methods for deep learning models. These methods estimate image transformation policies for train data that improve generalization to test data. While recent papers evolved in the direction of decreasing policy search complexity, we show that those methods are not robust when applied to biased and noisy data. To overcome these limitations, we reformulate AutoAugment as a generalized automated dataset optimization (AutoDO) task that minimizes the distribution shift between test data and distorted train dataset. In our AutoDO model, we explicitly estimate a set of per-point hyperparameters to flexibly change distribution of train data. In particular, we include hyperparameters for augmentation, loss weights, and softlabels that are jointly estimated using implicit differentiation. We develop a theoretical probabilistic interpretation of this framework using Fisher information and show that its complexity scales linearly with the dataset size. Our experiments on SVHN, CIFAR-10/100, and ImageNet classification show up to 9.3% improvement for biased datasets with label noise compared to prior methods and, importantly, up to 36.6% gain for underrepresented SVHN classes1. Denis A. Gudovskiy, Luca Rigazio, Shun Ishizaka, Kazuki Kozuka, Sotaro Tsukizawa |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2020 | Deep Active Learning for Biased Datasets via Fisher Kernel Self-SupervisionabstractActive learning (AL) aims to minimize labeling efforts for data-demanding deep neural networks (DNNs) by selecting the most representative data points for annotation. However, currently used methods are ill-equipped to deal with biased data. The main motivation of this paper is to consider a realistic setting for pool-based semi-supervised AL, where the unlabeled collection of train data is biased. We theoretically derive an optimal acquisition function for AL in this setting. It can be formulated as distribution shift minimization between unlabeled train data and weakly-labeled validation dataset. To implement such acquisition function, we propose a low-complexity method for feature density matching using self-supervised Fisher kernel (FK) as well as several novel pseudo-label estimators. Our FK-based method outperforms state-of-the-art methods on MNIST, SVHN, and ImageNet classification while requiring only 1/10th of processing. The conducted experiments show at least 40% drop in labeling efforts for the biased class-imbalanced data compared to existing methods. Denis A. Gudovskiy, Alec Hodgkinson, Takuya Yamaguchi, Sotaro Tsukizawa |
CVPR | 4 |