James A. Ruddy

dblp:82/840 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 77% Query processing and optimization · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management
query offloading
0.112008
Integration of Server, Storage and Database Stack: Moving Processing Towards Data · ICDE 2008
Query processing and optimization › OLAP
star query
0.012008
Integration of Server, Storage and Database Stack: Moving Processing Towards Data · ICDE 2008
Storage systems › computational storage
in-storage computing
0.012008
Integration of Server, Storage and Database Stack: Moving Processing Towards Data · ICDE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value proposition analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Integration of Server, Storage and Database Stack: Moving Processing Towards Data
abstract
Storage architecture includes more and more processing power for increasing requirement of reliability, managibility and scalability. For example, an IBM storage server is equipped with 4 or 8 state-of-the-art processors and gigabytes of memories. This trend enables analyzing data locally inside a storage server. Processing data locally is appealing under the following circumstances: (1) huge reduction of data flowing to the host, (2) reduction of CPU consumption on host. Accordingly, the benefits are (1) less data traffic through IO channel to the host, (2) better utilization of host bufferpool, and (3) enabling more workload on the host. One crucial task is to understand how DBMS can benefit from such hardware. That is to identify which database operations are beneficial to be offloaded given a query workload in a particular setting. For certain operations, we establish value proposition via various approaches and show the analytical and experimental results. In particular, starjoin queries are commonly used in business warehouses. We propose to offload a portion of a starjoin query from host to the POWER5 P processors on a storage server, which dramatically reduces the amount of channel IO and host CPU consumption. Moreover, the query elapsed time is improved via the exploitation of the state-of-the-art P processors on a storage server.
Lin Qiao 0001, Vijayshankar Raman, Inderpal Narang, Prashant Pandey 0005, David D. Chambliss, Gene Fuh, James A. Ruddy, Ying-Lin Chen, Kou-Horng Yang, Fen-Ling Ling
ICDE7