Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Felix Klar
dblp:83/2201
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 92% Software maintenance and evolution · 8% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
graph transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
metamodeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › model transformation
model transformation languages |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool interoperability |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
triple graph grammars · 0.2metamodeling · 0.1graph transformation · 0.1QVT · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 15 Years of Triple Graph Grammars
Andy Schürr, Felix Klar |
ICGT | 2 |
| 2008 | Metamodel-based tool integration with moflonabstractNowadays, a typical software development process involves many developers which participate in the development process by using a wide variety of development tools. As a consequence, the data representing the project as a whole is distributed over different development tools. For the purpose of consistency, maintainability, and traceability it is an essential task to be aware of the relationships between semantic equivalent data in different tool repositories. The real-time systems Lab at the Technische Universitat Darmstadt performs research in the area of tool and metamodel integration to provide solutions to overcome this gap. In this demonstration we present the metamodeling framework MOFLON that addresses these issues by bringing together the latest OMG standards with graph transformations and triple graph grammars. Using MOFLON, developers can generate code for specific tools needed to perform analysis and transformation on one development tool or to incrementally integrate data of different modeling tools. Carsten Amelunxen, Felix Klar, Alexander Königs, Tobias Rötschke, Andy Schürr |
ICSE | 2 |
| 2007 | Model transformation in the largeabstractCurrent rule-based model transformation approaches as the Query / View / Transformation (QVT) standard or Triple Graph Grammars (TGGs) disregard means for structuring model transformation specifications. As a result large scale model transformation specifications are hard to understand and to maintain. Furthermore, these specifications cannot utilize reusing mechanisms which would reduce the size of the specifications and improve their readability. In this paper we discuss how to transfer means for structuring huge metamodels and models as provided by common modeling languages to the world of model transformation languages. We focus on generalization issues as well as on package dependencies. As a result we come up with an extension to our TGG approach that enables the user to specify structured bidirectional model transformations in a declarative way. Felix Klar, Alexander Königs, Andy Schürr |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |