Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shu-Qin Wang

dblp:83/294 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.312017
Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection › information-theoretic feature selection
mutual information based feature selection
0.312017
Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
0.312017
Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.122017
Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Ensemble Rough Hypercuboid Approach for Classifying Cancers · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification
0.112010
Ensemble Rough Hypercuboid Approach for Classifying Cancers · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression classification
0.112010
Ensemble Rough Hypercuboid Approach for Classifying Cancers · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
discriminative feature selection
0.112017
Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.012010
Ensemble Rough Hypercuboid Approach for Classifying Cancers · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutual information · 0.6independent classification information · 0.6rough set theory · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Grade: Generative graph contrastive learning for multimodal recommendation
Yuchao Ping, Shu-Qin Wang, Ziyi Yang 0013, Yongquan Dong, Mengxiang Hu, Peilin Zhang
Neurocomputing2
2017 Feature Selection by Maximizing Independent Classification Information
abstract
Feature selection approaches based on mutual information can be roughly categorized into two groups. The first group minimizes the redundancy of features between each other. The second group maximizes the new classification information of features providing for the selected subset. A critical issue is that large new information does not signify little redundancy, and vice versa. Features with large new information but with high redundancy may be selected by the second group, and features with low redundancy but with little relevance with classes may be highly scored by the first group. Existing approaches fail to balance the importance of both terms. As such, a new information term denoted as Independent Classification Information is proposed in this paper. It assembles the newly provided information and the preserved information negatively correlated with the redundant information. Redundancy and new information are properly unified and equally treated in the new term. This strategy helps find the predictive features providing large new information and little redundancy. Moreover, independent classification information is proved as a loose upper bound of the total classification information of feature subset. Its maximization is conducive to achieve a high global discriminative performance. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the new approach.
Jun Wang 0023, Jinmao Wei 0001, Zhenglu Yang, Shu-Qin Wang
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.4
2010 A novel measure for evaluating classifiers
Jinmao Wei 0001, Xiao-Jie Yuan, Qinghua Hu, Shu-Qin Wang
Expert Syst. Appl.4
2010 Ensemble Rough Hypercuboid Approach for Classifying Cancers
abstract
Cancer classification is the critical basis for patient-tailored therapy. Conventional histological analysis tends to be unreliable because different tumors may have similar appearance. The advances in microarray technology make individualized therapy possible. Various machine learning methods can be employed to classify cancer tissue samples based on microarray data. However, few methods can be elegantly adopted for generating accurate and reliable as well as biologically interpretable rules. In this paper, we introduce an approach for classifying cancers based on the principle of minimal rough fringe. For training rough hypercuboid classifiers from gene expression data sets, the method dynamically evaluates all available genes and sifts the genes with the smallest implicit regions as the dimensions of implicit hypercuboids. An unseen object is predicted to be a certain class if it falls within the corresponding class hypercuboid. Based upon the method, ensemble rough hypercuboid classifiers are subsequently constructed. Experimental results on some open cancer gene expression data sets show that the proposed method is capable of generating accurate and interpretable rules compared with some other machine learning methods. Hence, it is a feasible way of classifying cancer tissues in biomedical applications.
Jinmao Wei 0001, Shu-Qin Wang, Xiao-Jie Yuan
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2