Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephen Schwab

dblp:83/3126 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0002-4305-9454ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Network measurement and analytics · 96% Internet architecture and protocols · 4%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 56% Cloud and datacenter computing · 44%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › network performance measurement
quality of service measurement
0.112007
When is service really denied?: a user-centric dos metric · SIGMETRICS 2007
Network security › attack strategy
denial-of-service attack
0.112007
When is service really denied?: a user-centric dos metric · SIGMETRICS 2007
Distributed systems
distributed resource management
0.012003
SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering · SOSP 2003
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource allocation
0.012003
SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering · SOSP 2003
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012003
SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering · SOSP 2003
Internet architecture and protocols › future internet architecture
active networks
0.012001
An OS interface for active routers · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

packet trace analysis · 0.1semantic modeling · 0.1tickets and leases · 0.0cryptographic claims · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A Semantic Framework for Data Analysis in Networked Systems
Arun Viswanathan, Alefiya Hussain, Jelena Mirkovic, Stephen Schwab, John Wroclawski
NSDI4
2009 The Case for Service Overlays
abstract
The Internet was designed as a packet-switched network in the 1960's and 1970's, with the explicit intent of sacrificing quality-of-service guarantees for an individual application in order to optimize channel usage and provide optimal median service for all applications. This approach was successful, since the application mix of the Internet heretofore has been dominated by applications with low quality-of-service needs: primarily bulk data transfer and low-bandwidth text- based interactive applications. As the Internet absorbs other networks and applications with strong quality-of-service requirements (television, voice over IP) , this tradeoff changes. We are faced with the problem of introducing the quality- of-service guarantees of circuit-switching into packet-switched networks. Fundamental change to the lower layers of the Internet stack have proven infeasible; even strongly-motivated, well-designed modifications which made transition a first-class design consideration have had difficult introductions. ATM and IPv6 are two recent examples. One effective transition strategy for new networking techniques has been the use of overlays. In this paper, we introduce the concept of a service overlay network, to offer circuit-switched behavior on legacy IP networks, and establish the requirements on the underlying IP network to make this strategy effective.
Jack Brassil, Rick McGeer, Puneet Sharma 0001, Praveen Yalagandula, Brian L. Mark, Stephen Schwab
ICCCN7
2008 Improving VPN performance over multiple access links
abstract
To improve the performance of VPN connections we investigate how the bandwidth of multiple access links can be aggregated with inverse multiplexing to create a single, higher capacity logical communication link. But achieving the maximum possible aggregated TCP throughput becomes extremely challenging if the underlying links either use different technologies (e.g., DSL, cable modem) or suffer different or time-varying communication characteristics (e.g., available bandwidth, packet loss rate). To maximize VPN throughput we have constructed a system that combines two distinct innovations. First, we continuously measure the communication characteristics of the underlying component links in our aggregate and dynamically assign packets to each link in proportion to its available capacity. Second, we modify TCP congestion control across the inverse-multiplexed access hop to avoid rate decreases normally initiated by the delayed acknowledgments often triggered when using legacy TCP on multiple heterogeneous paths. We describe the systempsilas implementation, the test environment we built on Emulab, and show that when access links form the communication bottleneck in the end-to-end connection we can significantly increase VPN performance over conventional approaches.
Jack Brassil, Rick McGeer, Raj Rajagopalan, Andy C. Bavier, Larry Roberts, Brian L. Mark, Stephen Schwab
BROADNETS7
2007 When is service really denied?: a user-centric dos metric
abstract
Denial-of-service (DoS) research community lacks accurate metrics to evaluate an attack's impact on network services, its severity and the effectiveness of a potential defense. We propose several DoS impact metrics that measure the quality of service experienced by end users during an attack, and compare these measurements to application-specific thresholds. Our metrics are ideal for testbed experimentation, since necessary traffic parameters are extracted from packet traces gathered during an experiment.
Jelena Mirkovic, Alefiya Hussain, Brett Wilson, Sonia Fahmy, Wei-Min Yao, Peter L. Reiher, Stephen Schwab, Roshan K. Thomas
SIGMETRICS7
2003 SHARP: an architecture for secure resource peering
abstract
This paper presents Sharp, a framework for secure distributed resource management in an Internet-scale computing infrastructure. The cornerstone of Sharp is a construct to represent cryptographically protected resource claims ---promises or rights to control resources for designated time intervals---together with secure mechanisms to subdivide and delegate claims across a network of resource managers. These mechanisms enable flexible resource peering : sites may trade their resources with peering partners or contribute them to a federation according to local policies. A separation of claims into tickets and leases allows coordinated resource management across the system while preserving site autonomy and local control over resources. Sharp also introduces mechanisms for controlled, accountable oversubscription of resource claims as a fundamental tool for dependable, efficient resource management. We present experimental results from a Sharp prototype for PlanetLab, and illustrate its use with a decentralized barter economy for global PlanetLab resources. The results demonstrate the power and practicality of the architecture, and the effectiveness of oversubscription for protecting resource availability in the presence of failures.
Yun Fu 0003, Jeffrey S. Chase, Brent N. Chun, Stephen Schwab, Amin Vahdat
SOSP4
2001 An OS interface for active routers
abstract
This paper describes an operating system (OS) interface for active routers. This interface allows code loaded into active routers to access the router's memory, communication, and computational resources on behalf of different packet flows. In addition to motivating and describing the interface, the paper also reports our experiences implementing the interface in three different OS environments: Scout, the OSKit, and the esokernel.
Larry Peterson, Yitzchak Gottlieb, Mike Hibler, Patrick Tullmann, Jay Lepreau, Stephen Schwab, Hrishikesh Dandekar, Andrew Purtell, John Hartman
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.6