Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jeehyun Lee 0002

dblp:83/367-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-0535-7397ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › clock network synthesis › clock tree synthesis
clock tree optimization
0.612022
A Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization Framework Using Generative Adversarial Learning · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation › physical design › clock network synthesis
clock tree synthesis
0.612022
A Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization Framework Using Generative Adversarial Learning · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.612022
A Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization Framework Using Generative Adversarial Learning · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022
Electronic design automation
design space exploration
0.212022
A Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization Framework Using Generative Adversarial Learning · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.6generative adversarial network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization Framework Using Generative Adversarial Learning
abstract
Modern physical design flows highly depend on design space exploration to find the commercial tools’ clock tree synthesis (CTS) parameters that lead to optimized clock trees. However, such exploration is often time-consuming and computationally inefficient. In this article, we overcome this drawback by proposing a novel framework named GAN-CTS, which utilizes conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) to predict and optimize CTS outcomes. Our framework is built upon three sequential learning stages. First, to precisely characterize distinct designs, we leverage transfer learning to extract netlist features directly from placement images. Second, we perform regression learning using various methods to predict the target CTS outcomes and demonstrate that the proposed multitask learning approach achieves better accuracy than the meta-modeling method adopted by previous works. To fully benefit from the predictions made by our framework, we further quantitatively interpret the importance of each CTS input parameter subject to various design objectives through attribution-based learning. Finally, generative adversarial learning is leveraged to optimize the target clock metrics with the guidance provided by the pretrained regression model. To substantiate the generality of our framework, we perform validations on four unseen netlists that are not utilized in the training process. The experimental results conducted on real-world designs demonstrate that our framework: 1) achieves an average prediction error of 3%; 2) improves the commercial tool’s auto-generated clock tree by 20.7% in clock power, 21.5% in clock wirelength, 36.1% in the worst skew; and 3) reaches an F1-score of 0.93 in the classification task of determining successful and failed CTS runs.
Yi-Chen Lu, Jeehyun Lee 0002, Anthony Agnesina, Kambiz Samadi, Sung Kyu Lim
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2019 GAN-CTS: A Generative Adversarial Framework for Clock Tree Prediction and Optimization
abstract
In this paper, we propose a complete framework named GAN-CTS which utilizes conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) and reinforcement learning to predict and optimize clock tree synthesis (CTS) outcomes. To precisely characterize different netlists, we leverage transfer learning to extract design features directly from placement images. Based on the proposed framework, we further quantitatively interpret the importance of each CTS input parameter subject to various design objectives. Finally, to prove the generality of our framework, we conduct experiments on the unseen netlists which are not utilized in the training process. Experimental results performed on industrial designs demonstrate that our framework (1) achieves an average prediction error of 3%, (2) improves the commercial tool's auto-generated clock tree by 51.5% in clock power, 18.5% in clock wirelength, 5.3% in the maximum skew, and (3) reaches an F1-score of 0.952 in the classification task of determining successful and failed CTS processes.
Yi-Chen Lu, Jeehyun Lee 0002, Anthony Agnesina, Kambiz Samadi, Sung Kyu Lim
ICCAD2
2019 Tier Partitioning and Flip-flop Relocation Methods for Clock Trees in Monolithic 3D ICs
abstract
In this paper, we propose simple but effective clock tree optimization algorithms for monolithic 3D ICs that are based on tier partitioning and flip-flop relocation. Our algorithms take into account 3D timing critical paths, clock skew, and the clock tree hierarchy for a better quality 3D clock tree. We also perform clock slew manipulation and buffer reduction to further improve the 3D designs. We tested four industrial benchmarks implemented using a commercial library and observed up to 34.3% clock skew, 35.9% clock wirelength, 10.0% combinational clock power, and 15.5% total power savings compared to the state-of-the-art [8].
Da Eun Shim, Sai Pentapati, Jeehyun Lee 0002, Yun Seop Yu, Sung Kyu Lim
ISLPED3