Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guichun Hua
dblp:83/409
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 67% Data mining · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
feature selection for ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Hierarchical feature selection for ranking · WWW 2010 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
hierarchical feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Hierarchical feature selection for ranking · WWW 2010 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Hierarchical feature selection for ranking · WWW 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature selection · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Hierarchical feature selection for rankingabstractRanking is an essential part of information retrieval(IR) tasks such as Web search. Nowadays there are hundreds of features for ranking. So learning to rank(LTR), an interdisciplinary field of IR and machine learning(ML), has attracted increasing attention. Those features used in the IR are not always independent from each other, hence the feature selection, an important issue in ML, should be paid attention to for LTR. However, the state-of-the-art LTR approaches merely analyze the connection among the features from the aspects of feature selection. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical feature selection strategy containing 2 phases for ranking and learn ranking functions. The experimental results show that ranking functions based on the selected feature subset significantly outperform the ones based on all features. Guichun Hua, Min Zhang 0006, Yiqun Liu 0001, Shaoping Ma, Liyun Ru |
WWW | 1 |