Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jing Ren 0010

dblp:83/709-10 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-0301-1866ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation › side information-enhanced sequential recommendation
multimodal sequential recommendation
0.912025
When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation
0.912025
When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark
0.312025
When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312025
When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

re-ranking · 0.9large vision-language model · 0.9item enhancement · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study
abstract
As multimedia content continues to grow on the web, the integration of visual and textual data has become a crucial challenge for web applications, particularly in recommendation systems. Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in addressing this challenge across various tasks that require such multimodal integration. However, their application in multimodal sequential recommendation (MSR) has not been extensively studied. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSRBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate different LVLM integration strategies in web-based recommendation scenarios. We benchmark three state-of-the-art LVLMs, i.e., GPT-4 Vision, GPT-4o, and Claude-3-Opus, on the next item prediction task using the constructed Amazon Review Plus dataset, which includes additional item descriptions generated by LVLMs. Our evaluation examines five integration strategies: using LVLMs as recommender, item enhancer, reranker, and various combinations of these roles. The benchmark results reveal that 1) using LVLMs as rerankers is the most effective strategy, significantly outperforming others that rely on LVLMs to directly generate recommendations or only enhance items; 2) GPT-4o consistently achieves the best performance across most scenarios, particularly when employed as a reranker; 3) the computational inefficiency of LVLMs presents a major barrier to their widespread adoption in real-time multimodal recommendation systems. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/PALIN2018/MSRBench.
Peilin Zhou, Chao Liu 0001, Jing Ren 0010, Xinfeng Zhou, Yueqi Xie, Meng Cao 0002, Zhongtao Rao, You-Liang Huang, Dading Chong, Junling Liu, Jae Boum Kim, Shoujin Wang, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Sunghun Kim 0001
WWW3