Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jing Ren 0010
dblp:83/709-10
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-0301-1866ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation › side information-enhanced sequential recommendation
multimodal sequential recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Recommender systems
sequential recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical Study · WWW 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
re-ranking · 0.9large vision-language model · 0.9item enhancement · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | When Large Vision Language Models Meet Multimodal Sequential Recommendation: An Empirical StudyabstractAs multimedia content continues to grow on the web, the integration of visual and textual data has become a crucial challenge for web applications, particularly in recommendation systems. Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in addressing this challenge across various tasks that require such multimodal integration. However, their application in multimodal sequential recommendation (MSR) has not been extensively studied. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSRBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to systematically evaluate different LVLM integration strategies in web-based recommendation scenarios. We benchmark three state-of-the-art LVLMs, i.e., GPT-4 Vision, GPT-4o, and Claude-3-Opus, on the next item prediction task using the constructed Amazon Review Plus dataset, which includes additional item descriptions generated by LVLMs. Our evaluation examines five integration strategies: using LVLMs as recommender, item enhancer, reranker, and various combinations of these roles. The benchmark results reveal that 1) using LVLMs as rerankers is the most effective strategy, significantly outperforming others that rely on LVLMs to directly generate recommendations or only enhance items; 2) GPT-4o consistently achieves the best performance across most scenarios, particularly when employed as a reranker; 3) the computational inefficiency of LVLMs presents a major barrier to their widespread adoption in real-time multimodal recommendation systems. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/PALIN2018/MSRBench. Peilin Zhou, Chao Liu 0001, Jing Ren 0010, Xinfeng Zhou, Yueqi Xie, Meng Cao 0002, Zhongtao Rao, You-Liang Huang, Dading Chong, Junling Liu, Jae Boum Kim, Shoujin Wang, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Sunghun Kim 0001 |
WWW | 3 |