VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Santosh Kumar Divvala
dblp:83/7658
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4042-5874ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 11 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 24% Vision and language · 22% Video understanding and tracking · 16% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Video Relationship Reasoning Using Gated Spatio-Temporal Energy Graph · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
spatio-temporal graph |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Video Relationship Reasoning Using Gated Spatio-Temporal Energy Graph · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual relationship reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Video Relationship Reasoning Using Gated Spatio-Temporal Energy Graph · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | DOCK: Detecting Objects by Transferring Common-Sense Knowledge · ECCV (13) 2018 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Temporal Fields for Action Recognition · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › deep video understanding › video reasoning
temporal action reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Temporal Fields for Action Recognition · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › temporal modeling
temporal structure modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Asynchronous Temporal Fields for Action Recognition · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
one-stage object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection · CVPR 2016 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › efficient object detection
real-time object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection · CVPR 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | VisKE: Visual knowledge extraction and question answering by visual verification of relation phrases · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Segment-Phrase Table for Semantic Segmentation, Visual Entailment and Paraphrasing · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual entailment |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Segment-Phrase Table for Semantic Segmentation, Visual Entailment and Paraphrasing · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
visual concept learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Everything about Anything: Webly-Supervised Visual Concept Learning · CVPR 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
webly supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Learning Everything about Anything: Webly-Supervised Visual Concept Learning · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
contextual reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | An empirical study of context in object detection · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | An empirical study of context in object detection · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
object detection evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | An empirical study of context in object detection · CVPR 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | VisKE: Visual knowledge extraction and question answering by visual verification of relation phrases · CVPR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conditional random field · 0.7spatio-temporal graph · 0.4gated energy function · 0.4commonsense knowledge transfer · 0.3deep network · 0.3asynchronous variational inference · 0.3end-to-end training · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2text-image joint analysis · 0.2spatial consistency reasoning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Video Relationship Reasoning Using Gated Spatio-Temporal Energy GraphabstractVisual relationship reasoning is a crucial yet challenging task for understanding rich interactions across visual concepts. For example, a relationship {man, open, door} involves a complex relation {open} between concrete entities {man, door}. While much of the existing work has studied this problem in the context of still images, understanding visual relationships in videos has received limited attention. Due to their temporal nature, videos enable us to model and reason about a more comprehensive set of visual relationships, such as those requiring multiple (temporal) observations (e.g., {man, lift up, box} vs. {man, put down, box}), as well as relationships that are often correlated through time (e.g., {woman, pay, money} followed by {woman, buy, coffee}). In this paper, we construct a Conditional Random Field on a fully-connected spatiotemporal graph that exploits the statistical dependency between relational entities spatially and temporally. We introduce a novel gated energy function parametrization that learns adaptive relations conditioned on visual observations. Our model optimization is computationally efficient, and its space computation complexity is significantly amortized through our proposed parameterization. Experimental results on benchmark video datasets (ImageNet Video and Charades) demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across three standard relationship reasoning tasks: Detection, Tagging, and Recognition. Yao-Hung Tsai, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Louis-Philippe Morency, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Ali Farhadi |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | DOCK: Detecting Objects by Transferring Common-Sense Knowledge
Krishna Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ali Farhadi, Yong Jae Lee |
ECCV (13) | 2 |
| 2017 | Asynchronous Temporal Fields for Action RecognitionabstractActions are more than just movements and trajectories: we cook to eat and we hold a cup to drink from it. A thorough understanding of videos requires going beyond appearance modeling and necessitates reasoning about the sequence of activities, as well as the higher-level constructs such as intentions. But how do we model and reason about these? We propose a fully-connected temporal CRF model for reasoning over various aspects of activities that includes objects, actions, and intentions, where the potentials are predicted by a deep network. End-to-end training of such structured models is a challenging endeavor: For inference and learning we need to construct mini-batches consisting of whole videos, leading to mini-batches with only a few videos. This causes high-correlation between data points leading to breakdown of the backprop algorithm. To address this challenge, we present an asynchronous variational inference method that allows efficient end-to-end training. Our method achieves a classification mAP of 22.4% on the Charades [42] benchmark, outperforming the state-of-the-art (17.2% mAP), and offers equal gains on the task of temporal localization. Gunnar A. Sigurdsson, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ali Farhadi, Abhinav Gupta 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2016 | You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object DetectionabstractWe present YOLO, a new approach to object detection. Prior work on object detection repurposes classifiers to perform detection. Instead, we frame object detection as a regression problem to spatially separated bounding boxes and associated class probabilities. A single neural network predicts bounding boxes and class probabilities directly from full images in one evaluation. Since the whole detection pipeline is a single network, it can be optimized end-to-end directly on detection performance. Our unified architecture is extremely fast. Our base YOLO model processes images in real-time at 45 frames per second. A smaller version of the network, Fast YOLO, processes an astounding 155 frames per second while still achieving double the mAP of other real-time detectors. Compared to state-of-the-art detection systems, YOLO makes more localization errors but is less likely to predict false positives on background. Finally, YOLO learns very general representations of objects. It outperforms other detection methods, including DPM and R-CNN, when generalizing from natural images to other domains like artwork. Joseph Redmon, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ross B. Girshick, Ali Farhadi |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2016 | FigureSeer: Parsing Result-Figures in Research Papers
Noah Siegel, Zachary Horvitz, Roie Levin, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ali Farhadi |
ECCV (7) | 4 |
| 2015 | VisKE: Visual knowledge extraction and question answering by visual verification of relation phrasesabstractHow can we know whether a statement about our world is valid. For example, given a relationship between a pair of entities e.g., `eat(horse, hay)', how can we know whether this relationship is true or false in general. Gathering such knowledge about entities and their relationships is one of the fundamental challenges in knowledge extraction. Most previous works on knowledge extraction have focused purely on text-driven reasoning for verifying relation phrases. In this work, we introduce the problem of visual verification of relation phrases and developed a Visual Knowledge Extraction system called VisKE. Given a verb-based relation phrase between common nouns, our approach assess its validity by jointly analyzing over text and images and reasoning about the spatial consistency of the relative configurations of the entities and the relation involved. Our approach involves no explicit human supervision thereby enabling large-scale analysis. Using our approach, we have already verified over 12000 relation phrases. Our approach has been used to not only enrich existing textual knowledge bases by improving their recall, but also augment open-domain question-answer reasoning. Fereshteh Sadeghi, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ali Farhadi |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2015 | Segment-Phrase Table for Semantic Segmentation, Visual Entailment and ParaphrasingabstractWe introduce Segment-Phrase Table (SPT), a large collection of bijective associations between textual phrases and their corresponding segmentations. Leveraging recent progress in object recognition and natural language semantics, we show how we can successfully build a high-quality segment-phrase table using minimal human supervision. More importantly, we demonstrate the unique value unleashed by this rich bimodal resource, for both vision as well as natural language understanding. First, we show that fine-grained textual labels facilitate contextual reasoning that helps in satisfying semantic constraints across image segments. This feature enables us to achieve state-of-the-art segmentation results on benchmark datasets. Next, we show that the association of high-quality segmentations to textual phrases aids in richer semantic understanding and reasoning of these textual phrases. Leveraging this feature, we motivate the problem of visual entailment and visual paraphrasing, and demonstrate its utility on a large dataset. Hamid Izadinia, Fereshteh Sadeghi, Santosh Kumar Divvala, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Yejin Choi 0001, Ali Farhadi |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2014 | Learning Everything about Anything: Webly-Supervised Visual Concept LearningabstractRecognition is graduating from labs to real-world applications. While it is encouraging to see its potential being tapped, it brings forth a fundamental challenge to the vision researcher: scalability. How can we learn a model for any concept that exhaustively covers all its appearance variations, while requiring minimal or no human supervision for compiling the vocabulary of visual variance, gathering the training images and annotations, and learning the models? In this paper, we introduce a fully-automated approach for learning extensive models for a wide range of variations (e.g. actions, interactions, attributes and beyond) within any concept. Our approach leverages vast resources of online books to discover the vocabulary of variance, and intertwines the data collection and modeling steps to alleviate the need for explicit human supervision in training the models. Our approach organizes the visual knowledge about a concept in a convenient and useful way, enabling a variety of applications across vision and NLP. Our online system has been queried by users to learn models for several interesting concepts including breakfast, Gandhi, beautiful, etc. To date, our system has models available for over 50, 000 variations within 150 concepts, and has annotated more than 10 million images with bounding boxes. Santosh Kumar Divvala, Ali Farhadi, Carlos Guestrin |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Object Instance Sharing by Enhanced Bounding Box CorrespondenceabstractMost contemporary object detection approaches assume each object instance in the training data to be uniquely represented by a single bounding box. In this paper, we go beyond this conventional view by allowing an object instance to be described by multiple bounding boxes. The new bounding box annotations are determined based on the alignment of an object instance with the other training instances in the dataset. Our proposal enables the training data to be reused multiple times for training richer multi-component category models. We operationalize this idea by two complementary operations: bounding box shrinking, which finds subregions of an object instance that could be shared; and bounding box enlarging, which enlarges object instances to include local contextual cues. We empirically validate our approach on the PASCAL VOC detection dataset. Santosh Kumar Divvala, Alexei A. Efros, Martial Hebert |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2012 | Exemplar Driven Character Recognition in the WildabstractCharacter recognition in natural scenes continues to represent a formidable challenge in computer vision. Traditional optical character recognition (OCR) methods fail to perform well on characters from scene text owing to a variety of difficulties in background clutter, binarisation, and arbitrary skew. Further, English characters group into only 62 classes whereas many of the world’s languages have several hundred classes. In particular, most Indic script languages such as Kannada exhibit large intra class diversity, while the only difference between two classes may be in a minor contour above or below the character. These considerations motivate an exemplar approach to classification; one which does not seek intra class commonality among extreme examples which are essentially sub classes of their own. Exemplar SVM’s have been recently introduced in the object recognition context. The essence of the exemplar approach is that rather than seeking to establish commonality within classes, a separate classifier is learnt for each exemplar in the dataset. To make individual classification simple, linear SVM’s are used and each classifier is hence an exemplar specific weight vector. Each exemplar in the dataset is resized to standard dimensions, and thence HOG features are densely extracted to create a rigid template xE . A set of negative samples NE are created by the same process from classes not corresponding to the exemplar. Each classifier (wE ,bE ) maximizes the separation between xE and every window in NE . This is equivalent to optimizing the convex objective[4]: Karthik Sheshadri, Santosh Kumar Divvala |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2009 | An empirical study of context in object detectionabstractThis paper presents an empirical evaluation of the role of context in a contemporary, challenging object detection task - the PASCAL VOC 2008. Previous experiments with context have mostly been done on home-grown datasets, often with non-standard baselines, making it difficult to isolate the contribution of contextual information. In this work, we present our analysis on a standard dataset, using top-performing local appearance detectors as baseline. We evaluate several different sources of context and ways to utilize it. While we employ many contextual cues that have been used before, we also propose a few novel ones including the use of geographic context and a new approach for using object spatial support. Santosh Kumar Divvala, Derek Hoiem, James Hays, Alexei A. Efros, Martial Hebert |
CVPR | 1 |