Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Darryl J. Pappin

dblp:83/7970 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-8981-8401ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
quantitative proteomics
0.112010
Computational protein profile similarity screening for quantitative mass spectrometry experiments · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis
0.012010
Computational protein profile similarity screening for quantitative mass spectrometry experiments · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical test for equality · 0.1correlation-based distance measure · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Computational protein profile similarity screening for quantitative mass spectrometry experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: The qualitative and quantitative characterization of protein abundance profiles over a series of time points or a set of environmental conditions is becoming increasingly important. Using isobaric mass tagging experiments, mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics deliver accurate peptide abundance profiles for relative quantitation. Associated data analysis workflows need to provide tailored statistical treatment that (i) takes the correlation structure of the normalized peptide abundance profiles into account and (ii) allows inference of protein-level similarity. We introduce a suitable distance measure for relative abundance profiles, derive a statistical test for equality and propose a protein-level representation of peptide-level measurements. This yields a workflow that delivers a similarity ranking of protein abundance profiles with respect to a defined reference. All procedures have in common that they operate based on the true correlation structure that underlies the measurements. This optimizes power and delivers more intuitive and efficient results than existing methods that do not take these circumstances into account. RESULTS: We use protein profile similarity screening to identify candidate proteins whose abundances are post-transcriptionally controlled by the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), a specific E3 ubiquitin ligase that is a master regulator of the cell cycle. Results are compared with an established protein correlation profiling method. The proposed procedure yields a 50.9-fold enrichment of co-regulated protein candidates and a 2.5-fold improvement over the previous method. AVAILABILITY: A MATLAB toolbox is available from http://hci.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/mip/proteomics.
Marc Kirchner, Bernhard Y. Renard, Ullrich Köthe, Darryl J. Pappin, Fred A. Hamprecht, Hanno Steen, Judith A. J. Steen
Bioinform.4