The fairness of machine learning-based decisions has become an increasingly important focus in the design of supervised machine learning methods. Most fairness approaches optimize a specified trade-off between performance measure(s) (e.g., accuracy, log loss, or AUC) and fairness metric(s) (e.g., demographic parity, equalized odds). This begs the question: are the right performance-fairness trade-offs being specified? We instead re-cast fair machine learning as an imitation learning task by introducing superhuman fairness, which seeks to simultaneously outperform human decisions on multiple predictive performance and fairness measures. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach given suboptimal decisions.

This work focuses on closed-loop control based on proprioceptive feedback for a pneumatically-actuated soft wearable device aimed at future support of infant reaching tasks. The device comprises two soft pneumatic actuators (one textile-based and one silicone-casted) actively controlling two degrees-of-freedom per arm (shoulder adduction/abduction and elbow flexion/extension, respectively). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) attached to the wearable device provide real-time joint angle feedback. Device kinematics analysis is informed by anthropometric data from infants (arm lengths) reported in the literature. Range of motion and muscle co-activation patterns in infant reaching are considered to derive desired trajectories for the device’s end-effector. Then, a proportional-derivative controller is developed to regulate the pressure inside the actuators and in turn move the arm along desired setpoints within the reachable workspace. Experimental results on tracking desired arm trajectories using an engineered mannequin are presented, demonstrating that the proposed controller can help guide the mannequin’s wrist to the desired setpoints.

The focus of the work in this paper is a systems-theoretic construction, analysis, and evaluation of a deterministic model of human decision making relative to experimental data. In sequential two-alternative forced choice decision tasks, a human subject is presented with two choices at every time step, is given finite time to select one of the choices, and receives a reward after a choice is made (presented as a number on a computer screen). The goal for the human is to obtain the maximal reward while not knowing the underlying reward assignment process. In this work, we present a parameterized deterministic model for human decision making in this context and analyze optimality and stability using a finite state machine approach. This model is then evaluated relative to experimental data from human subjects performing each of six tasks.