VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Simoncini
dblp:84/4375
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3772-5473ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
computational protein design |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Positive multistate protein design · Bioinform. 2020 A structural homology approach for computational protein design with flexible backbone · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
multistate protein design |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Positive multistate protein design · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein engineering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Positive multistate protein design · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A structural homology approach for computational protein design with flexible backbone · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cost function network · 0.4all-atom energy function · 0.4structural homology · 0.4side-chain sampling · 0.4energy function · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Using Monte Carlo Tree Search to Enhance Search Space Exploration in Cartesian Genetic Programming
Christina Berghegger, Camilo De La Torre, Sylvain Cussat-Blanc, Yuri Lavinas, David Simoncini |
EuroGP | 5 |
| 2020 | Positive multistate protein designabstractMOTIVATION: Structure-based computational protein design (CPD) plays a critical role in advancing the field of protein engineering. Using an all-atom energy function, CPD tries to identify amino acid sequences that fold into a target structure and ultimately perform a desired function. The usual approach considers a single rigid backbone as a target, which ignores backbone flexibility. Multistate design (MSD) allows instead to consider several backbone states simultaneously, defining challenging computational problems. RESULTS: We introduce efficient reductions of positive MSD problems to Cost Function Networks with two different fitness definitions and implement them in the Pompd (Positive Multistate Protein design) software. Pompd is able to identify guaranteed optimal sequences of positive multistate full protein redesign problems and exhaustively enumerate suboptimal sequences close to the MSD optimum. Applied to nuclear magnetic resonance and back-rubbed X-ray structures, we observe that the average energy fitness provides the best sequence recovery. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art guaranteed computational design approaches by orders of magnitudes and can solve MSD problems with sizes previously unreachable with guaranteed algorithms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://forgemia.inra.fr/thomas.schiex/pompd as documented Open Source. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jelena Vucinic, David Simoncini, Manon Ruffini, Sophie Barbe, Thomas Schiex |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | A structural homology approach for computational protein design with flexible backboneabstractMOTIVATION: Structure-based Computational Protein design (CPD) plays a critical role in advancing the field of protein engineering. Using an all-atom energy function, CPD tries to identify amino acid sequences that fold into a target structure and ultimately perform a desired function. Energy functions remain however imperfect and injecting relevant information from known structures in the design process should lead to improved designs. RESULTS: We introduce Shades, a data-driven CPD method that exploits local structural environments in known protein structures together with energy to guide sequence design, while sampling side-chain and backbone conformations to accommodate mutations. Shades (Structural Homology Algorithm for protein DESign), is based on customized libraries of non-contiguous in-contact amino acid residue motifs. We have tested Shades on a public benchmark of 40 proteins selected from different protein families. When excluding homologous proteins, Shades achieved a protein sequence recovery of 30% and a protein sequence similarity of 46% on average, compared with the PFAM protein family of the target protein. When homologous structures were added, the wild-type sequence recovery rate achieved 93%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Shades source code is available at https://bitbucket.org/satsumaimo/shades as a patch for Rosetta 3.8 with a curated protein structure database and ITEM library creation software. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. David Simoncini, Kam Y. J. Zhang, Thomas Schiex, Sophie Barbe |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2018 | Fitness landscape analysis around the optimum in computational protein designabstractThe geometry and properties of the fitness landscapes of Computational Protein Design (CPD) are not well understood, due to the difficulty for sampling methods to access the NP-hard optima and explore their neighborhoods. In this paper, we enumerate all solutions within a 2 kcal/mol energy interval of the optimum of two CPD problems. We compute the number of local minima, the size of the attraction basins, and the local optima network. We provide various features in order to characterize the fitness landscapes, in particular the multimodality, and the ruggedness of the fitness landscape. Results show some key differences in the fitness landscapes and help to understand the successes and failures of metaheuristics on CPD problems. Our analysis gives some previously inaccessible and valuable information on the problem structure related to the optima of the CPD instances (multi-funnel structure), and could lead to the development of more efficient metaheuristic methods. David Simoncini, Sophie Barbe, Thomas Schiex, Sébastien Vérel |
GECCO | 1 |
| 2016 | Guaranteed Weighted Counting for Affinity Computation: Beyond Determinism and Structure
Clément Viricel, David Simoncini, Sophie Barbe, Thomas Schiex |
CP | 2 |
| 2009 | Centric selection: a way to tune the exploration/exploitation trade-offabstractIn this paper, we study the exploration / exploitation trade-off in cellular genetic algorithms. We define a new selection scheme, the centric selection, which is tunable and allows controlling the selective pressure with a single parameter. The equilibrium model is used to study the influence of the centric selection on the selective pressure and a new model which takes into account problem dependent statistics and selective pressure in order to deal with the exploration / exploitation trade-off is proposed: the punctuated equilibria model. Performances on the quadratic assignment problem and NK-Landscapes put in evidence an optimal exploration / exploitation trade-off on both of the classes of problems. The punctuated equilibria model is used to explain these results. David Simoncini, Sébastien Vérel, Philippe Collard, Manuel Clergue |
GECCO | 1 |
| 2007 | On the influence of selection operators on performances in cellular Genetic AlgorithmsabstractIn this paper, we study the influence of the selective pressure on the performance of cellular genetic algorithms. Cellular genetic algorithms are genetic algorithms where the population is embedded on a toroidal grid. This structure makes the propagation of the best so far individual slow down, and allows to keep in the population potentially good solutions. We present two selective pressure reducing strategies in order to slow down even more the best solution propagation. We experiment these strategies on a hard optimization problem, the quadratic assignment problem, and we show that there is a threshold value of the control parameter for both which gives the best performance. This optimal value does not find explanation on the selective pressure only, measured either by takeover time or diversity evolution. This study makes us conclude that we need other tools than the sole selective pressure measures to explain the performance of cellular genetic algorithms. David Simoncini, Philippe Collard, Sébastien Vérel, Manuel Clergue |
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation | 1 |
| 2006 | Anisotropic selection in cellular genetic algorithmsabstractIn this paper we introduce a new selection scheme in cellular genetic algorithms (cGAs). Anisotropic Selection (AS) promotes diversity and allows accurate control of the selective pressure. First we compare this new scheme with the classical rectangular grid shapes solution according to the selective pressure: we can obtain the same takeover time with the two techniques although the spreading of the best individual is different. We then give experimental results that show to what extent AS promotes the emergence of niches that support low coupling and high cohesion. Finally, using a cGA with anisotropic selection on a Quadratic Assignment Problem we show the existence of an anisotropic optimal value for which the best average performance is observed. Further work will focus on the selective pressure self-adjustment ability provided by this new selection scheme. David Simoncini, Sébastien Vérel, Philippe Collard, Manuel Clergue |
GECCO | 1 |