Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kurt T. Miller

dblp:84/4570 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Graph learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.112009
Nonparametric Latent Feature Models for Link Prediction · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent feature model
0.112009
Nonparametric Latent Feature Models for Link Prediction · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction
0.112009
Nonparametric Latent Feature Models for Link Prediction · NIPS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonparametric bayesian inference · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Nonparametric Latent Feature Models for Link Prediction
abstract
As the availability and importance of relational data -- such as the friendships summarized on a social networking website -- increases, it becomes increasingly important to have good models for such data. The kinds of latent structure that have been considered for use in predicting links in such networks have been relatively limited. In particular, the machine learning community has focused on latent class models, adapting nonparametric Bayesian methods to jointly infer how many latent classes there are while learning which entities belong to each class. We pursue a similar approach with a richer kind of latent variable -- latent features -- using a nonparametric Bayesian technique to simultaneously infer the number of features at the same time we learn which entities have each feature. The greater expressiveness of this approach allows us to improve link prediction on three datasets.
Kurt T. Miller, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Michael I. Jordan
NIPS1
2008 The Phylogenetic Indian Buffet Process: A Non-Exchangeable Nonparametric Prior for Latent Features
Kurt T. Miller, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Michael I. Jordan
UAI1
1999 Fusing neuromorphic motion detector outputs for robust optic flow measurement
abstract
This paper presents a method for generating robust measurements by fusing the outputs of multiple elementary motion detector (EMD) circuits. The competitive feature tracker (CFT) algorithm is used to implement the EMD circuits. CFT measures motion by timing the movement of a feature across the visual field. Fusion is performed with leaky integrators. Each leaky integrator corresponds to a range of velocities and is stimulated whenever an EMD detects motion in the leaky integrator's velocity range. Thus the leaky integrator corresponding to the correct velocity receives the most stimulus. The other leaky integrators receive stimulus only from incorrect measurements. These incorrect stimuli are hence "voted out" and ignored. A proof-of-principle was obtained by implementing the algorithm in an optic flow sensor and exposing the sensor to moving texture stimulus. This sensor was then mounted onto a glider and placed in a control loop to cause the glider to steer away from a wall before collision.
Geoffrey L. Barrows, Kurt T. Miller, Brian Krantz
IJCNN2