Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John R. Barr 0002

dblp:84/4721-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
mass spectra classification
0.012004
Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis
0.012004
Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
spectral preprocessing
0.012004
Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens · Bioinform. 2004
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › string algorithms
string matching
0.011991
Improved algorithms for searching restriction maps · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 0.0noise thresholding · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Standardization and denoising algorithms for mass spectra to classify whole-organism bacterial specimens
abstract
MOTIVATION: Application of mass spectrometry in proteomics is a breakthrough in high-throughput analyses. Early applications have focused on protein expression profiles to differentiate among various types of tissue samples (e.g. normal versus tumor). Here our goal is to use mass spectra to differentiate bacterial species using whole-organism samples. The raw spectra are similar to spectra of tissue samples, raising some of the same statistical issues (e.g. non-uniform baselines and higher noise associated with higher baseline), but are substantially noisier. As a result, new preprocessing procedures are required before these spectra can be used for statistical classification. RESULTS: In this study, we introduce novel preprocessing steps that can be used with any mass spectra. These comprise a standardization step and a denoising step. The noise level for each spectrum is determined using only data from that spectrum. Only spectral features that exceed a threshold defined by the noise level are subsequently used for classification. Using this approach, we trained the Random Forest program to classify 240 mass spectra into four bacterial types. The method resulted in zero prediction errors in the training samples and in two test datasets having 240 and 300 spectra, respectively.
Glen A. Satten, Somnath Datta, Hercules Moura, Adrian R. Woolfitt, Maria da G. Carvalho, George M. Carlone, Barun K. De, Antonis Pavlopoulos, John R. Barr 0002
Bioinform.9
1991 Improved algorithms for searching restriction maps
abstract
We present algorithms for searching a DNA restriction enzyme map for a region that best matches a shorter 'probe' map. Our algorithms utilize a new model of map alignments, and extensive experiments prove our model superior to earlier approaches for certain applications. Let M be the number of map sites and P be the number of probe sites. Our first algorithm, which optimizes only over a restricted class of alignments, requires O(MP log P) worst-case time and O(M + P) space. Our second algorithm, which optimizes over all alignments, runs in O(MP3) time and O(M + P2) space, under reasonable assumptions about the distribution of restriction enzyme cleavage sites. Combining the algorithms gives a map-searching method that optimizes over all alignments in O(MP log P) time in practice. The algorithms' effectiveness is illustrated by searches involving a genomic restriction map of Escherichia coli.
Webb Miller, John R. Barr 0002, Kenneth E. Rudd
Comput. Appl. Biosci.2