Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Armando Martin Haeberer

dblp:84/4990 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 62% Empirical software engineering · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software engineering research methodology
0.012001
Scientific Rigour, an Answer to a Pragmatic Question: A Linguistic Framework for Software Engineering · ICSE 2001
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.011998
The Very Idea of Software Development Environments: A Conceptual Architecture for the ARTS Environment Paradigm · ASE 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011998
The Very Idea of Software Development Environments: A Conceptual Architecture for the ARTS Environment Paradigm · ASE 1998
Requirements engineering and software design › software design
software design theory
0.012001
Scientific Rigour, an Answer to a Pragmatic Question: A Linguistic Framework for Software Engineering · ICSE 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

philosophy of science · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Scientific Rigour, an Answer to a Pragmatic Question: A Linguistic Framework for Software Engineering
abstract
Discussions of the role of mathematics in software engineering are common and have probably not changed much over the last few decades. There is now much discussion about the "intuitive" nature of software construction and analogies are drawn (falsely) with graphic design, (conventional) architecture, etc. The conclusion is that mathematics is an unnecessary luxury and that, like these other disciplines, it is not needed in everyday practice. We attempt to refute these arguments by recourse to ideas from the philosophy of science developed over the past century. We demonstrate why these ideas are applicable, why they establish a framework (in the sense of Carnap) in which many central ideas in software engineering can be formalised and organised, why they refute the simplistic recourse to "intuition", and why they provide a scientific/engineering framework in which contributions to the theory and practice of software engineering can be judged.
Armando Martin Haeberer, T. S. E. Maibaum
ICSE1
1998 The Very Idea of Software Development Environments: A Conceptual Architecture for the ARTS Environment Paradigm
abstract
For the last three years the authors have been building an instantiation of a system development paradigm, called ARTS. The paradigm consists of a view of what a system development environment is, in general terms, and a methodology for instantiating the paradigm for particular and specific domains of application. The motivation for and the explanation of the paradigm are derived from extant epistemological models of the method of natural science. They assert that these models are directly applicable to the domain of software and systems construction, and that, from them, one can derive principles and explanations for what a software development environment should be. They present briefly the statement view of scientific theories, a conceptual architecture for software development environments whose rationale is given in terms of the statement view and some examples of how the present version of ARTS realises this conceptual architecture.
Armando Martin Haeberer, T. S. E. Maibaum
ASE1
1997 Fork Algebras in Algebra, Logic and Computer Science
abstract
Since the main themes at the Helena Rasiowa memorial were algebra, logic and computer science, we will present a survey of results on fork algebras from these points of view. In this paper we study fork algebras from the points of view of their algebraic and logical properties and applications. These results will prove to be essential, in a future work, for the definition of a wide-spectrum calculus for program construction.
Marcelo F. Frias, Gabriel Baum, Armando Martin Haeberer
Fundam. Informaticae3
1996 From Specifications to Programs: A Fork-Algebraic Approach to Bridge the Gap
Gabriel Baum, Marcelo F. Frias, Armando Martin Haeberer, Pablo E. Martínez López
MFCS3