Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Subhasree Mandal

dblp:85/11342 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-9175-7157ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 6 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
5 papers
Software-defined and programmable networks · 42% Routing and switching · 34% Internet architecture and protocols · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN control plane
distributed SDN
0.812024
A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024
Routing and switching › routing protocol
routing convergence
0.812024
A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024
Routing and switching
traffic engineering
0.632018
B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018
B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013
A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN control plane
0.512021
Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN applications
software-defined WAN
0.522018
B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018
B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013
Internet architecture and protocols › network topology
hierarchical network topology
0.312018
B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018
Internet architecture and protocols
wide area network
0.212024
A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
bandwidth management
0.212013
B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013
Datacenter networks
datacenter interconnect
0.212013
B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter network
0.112021
Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
software-defined networking
0.112021
Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.112012
A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.112012
A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
bandwidth allocation
0.012012
A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fairness
0.012012
A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

two-stage matching/hashing · 0.7rate limiting · 0.3centralized traffic engineering · 0.3linear programming · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GGN: Experiences in Designing and Deploying the Next-Generation Google Global Network
abstract
Cloud and AI/ML workloads are posing unprecedented new requirements on the wide-area network: it must combine strict availability, massive growth, and feature agility. It became increasingly clear that traditional WAN designs were ill-equipped to adapt to these requirements.
Mohammad Al-Fares, Richard Alimi, Arda Balkanay, Dennis Fetterly, Chi-Yao Hong, Nachikethas A. Jagadeesan, Bikash Koley, Priya Mahadevan, Subhasree Mandal, Warren Martins, Arjun Muralidharan, Namrata Pralhad Kadam, Aman Shaikh, Anees Shaikh, Rob Shakir, Sankalp Singh, Charith Wickramaarachchi, Jonathan Zolla
SIGCOMM9
2024 A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN
abstract
Motivated by our experiences operating a global WAN, we argue that SDN's reliance on infrastructure external to the data plane has substantially complicated the challenge of maintaining high availability. We propose a new decentralized SDN (dSDN) architecture in which SDN control logic instead runs within routers, eliminating the control plane's reliance on external infrastructure and restoring fate-sharing between control and data planes. We present dSDN as a simpler approach to realizing the benefits of SDN in the WAN. Despite its much simpler design, we show that dSDN is practical from an implementation viewpoint, and outperforms centralized SDN in terms of routing convergence and SLO impact.
Alexander Krentsel, Nitika Saran, Bikash Koley, Subhasree Mandal, Ashok Narayanan, Sylvia Ratnasamy, Ali Al-Shabibi, Anees Shaikh, Rob Shakir, Ankit Singla, Hakim Weatherspoon
SIGCOMM4
2021 Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane
Andrew D. Ferguson, Steve D. Gribble, Chi-Yao Hong, Chip Killian, Waqar Mohsin, Henrik Mühe, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Lorenzo Vicisano, Richard Alimi, Shawn Shuoshuo Chen, Mike Conley, Subhasree Mandal, Karthik Nagaraj, Kondapa Naidu Bollineni, Amr Sabaa, Shidong Zhang, Amin Vahdat
NSDI14
2018 B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN
abstract
Private WANs are increasingly important to the operation of enterprises, telecoms, and cloud providers. For example, B4, Google's private software-defined WAN, is larger and growing faster than our connectivity to the public Internet. In this paper, we present the five-year evolution of B4. We describe the techniques we employed to incrementally move from offering best-effort content-copy services to carrier-grade availability, while concurrently scaling B4 to accommodate 100x more traffic. Our key challenge is balancing the tension introduced by hierarchy required for scalability, the partitioning required for availability, and the capacity asymmetry inherent to the construction and operation of any large-scale network. We discuss our approach to managing this tension: i) we design a custom hierarchical network topology for both horizontal and vertical software scaling, ii) we manage inherent capacity asymmetry in hierarchical topologies using a novel traffic engineering algorithm without packet encapsulation, and iii) we re-architect switch forwarding rules via two-stage matching/hashing to deal with asymmetric network failures at scale.
Chi-Yao Hong, Subhasree Mandal, Mohammad Al-Fares, Richard Alimi, Kondapa Naidu Bollineni, Chandan Bhagat, Sourabh Jain, Jay Kaimal, Shiyu Liang, Kirill Mendelev, Steve Padgett, Faro Rabe, Saikat Ray, Malveeka Tewari, Matt Tierney, Monika Zahn, Jonathan Zolla, Joon Ong, Amin Vahdat
SIGCOMM2
2013 B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan
abstract
We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a private WAN connecting Google's data centers across the planet. B4 has a number of unique characteristics: i) massive bandwidth requirements deployed to a modest number of sites, ii) elastic traffic demand that seeks to maximize average bandwidth, and iii) full control over the edge servers and network, which enables rate limiting and demand measurement at the edge.
Sushant Jain, Subhasree Mandal, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Subbaiah Venkata, Jim Wanderer, Junlan Zhou, Jonathan Zolla, Urs Hölzle, Stephen Stuart, Amin Vahdat
SIGCOMM3
2012 A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering
abstract
One of the goals of traffic engineering is to achieve a flexible trade-off between fairness and throughput so that users are satisfied with their bandwidth allocation and the network operator is satisfied with the utilization of network resources. In this paper, we propose a novel way to balance the throughput and fairness objectives with linear programming. It allows the network operator to precisely control the trade-off by bounding the fairness degradation for each commodity compared to the max-min fair solution or the throughput degradation compared to the optimal throughput. We also present improvements to a previous algorithm that achieves max-min fairness by solving a series of linear programs. We significantly reduce the number of steps needed when the access rate of commodities is limited. We extend the algorithm to two important practical use cases: importance weights and piece-wise linear utility functions for commodities. Our experiments on synthetic and real networks show that our algorithms achieve a significant speedup and provide practical insights on the trade-off between fairness and throughput.
Emilie Danna, Subhasree Mandal
INFOCOM2