Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Subhasree Mandal
dblp:85/11342
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-9175-7157ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 6 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
5 papers |
Software-defined and programmable networks · 42% Routing and switching · 34% Internet architecture and protocols · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN control plane
distributed SDN |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024 |
Routing and switching › routing protocol
routing convergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024 |
Routing and switching
traffic engineering |
0.6 | 3 | 2018 | B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018 B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012 |
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN control plane |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › SDN applications
software-defined WAN |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018 B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Internet architecture and protocols › network topology
hierarchical network topology |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WAN · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Internet architecture and protocols
wide area network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WAN · SIGCOMM 2024 |
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
bandwidth management |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Datacenter networks
datacenter interconnect |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan · SIGCOMM 2013 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
datacenter network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
software-defined networking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane · NSDI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012 |
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
bandwidth allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012 |
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fairness |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineering · INFOCOM 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-stage matching/hashing · 0.7rate limiting · 0.3centralized traffic engineering · 0.3linear programming · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | GGN: Experiences in Designing and Deploying the Next-Generation Google Global NetworkabstractCloud and AI/ML workloads are posing unprecedented new requirements on the wide-area network: it must combine strict availability, massive growth, and feature agility. It became increasingly clear that traditional WAN designs were ill-equipped to adapt to these requirements. Mohammad Al-Fares, Richard Alimi, Arda Balkanay, Dennis Fetterly, Chi-Yao Hong, Nachikethas A. Jagadeesan, Bikash Koley, Priya Mahadevan, Subhasree Mandal, Warren Martins, Arjun Muralidharan, Namrata Pralhad Kadam, Aman Shaikh, Anees Shaikh, Rob Shakir, Sankalp Singh, Charith Wickramaarachchi, Jonathan Zolla |
SIGCOMM | 9 |
| 2024 | A Decentralized SDN Architecture for the WANabstractMotivated by our experiences operating a global WAN, we argue that SDN's reliance on infrastructure external to the data plane has substantially complicated the challenge of maintaining high availability. We propose a new decentralized SDN (dSDN) architecture in which SDN control logic instead runs within routers, eliminating the control plane's reliance on external infrastructure and restoring fate-sharing between control and data planes. We present dSDN as a simpler approach to realizing the benefits of SDN in the WAN. Despite its much simpler design, we show that dSDN is practical from an implementation viewpoint, and outperforms centralized SDN in terms of routing convergence and SLO impact. Alexander Krentsel, Nitika Saran, Bikash Koley, Subhasree Mandal, Ashok Narayanan, Sylvia Ratnasamy, Ali Al-Shabibi, Anees Shaikh, Rob Shakir, Ankit Singla, Hakim Weatherspoon |
SIGCOMM | 4 |
| 2021 | Orion: Google's Software-Defined Networking Control Plane
Andrew D. Ferguson, Steve D. Gribble, Chi-Yao Hong, Chip Killian, Waqar Mohsin, Henrik Mühe, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Lorenzo Vicisano, Richard Alimi, Shawn Shuoshuo Chen, Mike Conley, Subhasree Mandal, Karthik Nagaraj, Kondapa Naidu Bollineni, Amr Sabaa, Shidong Zhang, Amin Vahdat |
NSDI | 14 |
| 2018 | B4 and after: managing hierarchy, partitioning, and asymmetry for availability and scale in google's software-defined WANabstractPrivate WANs are increasingly important to the operation of enterprises, telecoms, and cloud providers. For example, B4, Google's private software-defined WAN, is larger and growing faster than our connectivity to the public Internet. In this paper, we present the five-year evolution of B4. We describe the techniques we employed to incrementally move from offering best-effort content-copy services to carrier-grade availability, while concurrently scaling B4 to accommodate 100x more traffic. Our key challenge is balancing the tension introduced by hierarchy required for scalability, the partitioning required for availability, and the capacity asymmetry inherent to the construction and operation of any large-scale network. We discuss our approach to managing this tension: i) we design a custom hierarchical network topology for both horizontal and vertical software scaling, ii) we manage inherent capacity asymmetry in hierarchical topologies using a novel traffic engineering algorithm without packet encapsulation, and iii) we re-architect switch forwarding rules via two-stage matching/hashing to deal with asymmetric network failures at scale. Chi-Yao Hong, Subhasree Mandal, Mohammad Al-Fares, Richard Alimi, Kondapa Naidu Bollineni, Chandan Bhagat, Sourabh Jain, Jay Kaimal, Shiyu Liang, Kirill Mendelev, Steve Padgett, Faro Rabe, Saikat Ray, Malveeka Tewari, Matt Tierney, Monika Zahn, Jonathan Zolla, Joon Ong, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 2 |
| 2013 | B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wanabstractWe present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a private WAN connecting Google's data centers across the planet. B4 has a number of unique characteristics: i) massive bandwidth requirements deployed to a modest number of sites, ii) elastic traffic demand that seeks to maximize average bandwidth, and iii) full control over the edge servers and network, which enables rate limiting and demand measurement at the edge. Sushant Jain, Subhasree Mandal, Joon Ong, Leonid B. Poutievski, Subbaiah Venkata, Jim Wanderer, Junlan Zhou, Jonathan Zolla, Urs Hölzle, Stephen Stuart, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 3 |
| 2012 | A practical algorithm for balancing the max-min fairness and throughput objectives in traffic engineeringabstractOne of the goals of traffic engineering is to achieve a flexible trade-off between fairness and throughput so that users are satisfied with their bandwidth allocation and the network operator is satisfied with the utilization of network resources. In this paper, we propose a novel way to balance the throughput and fairness objectives with linear programming. It allows the network operator to precisely control the trade-off by bounding the fairness degradation for each commodity compared to the max-min fair solution or the throughput degradation compared to the optimal throughput. We also present improvements to a previous algorithm that achieves max-min fairness by solving a series of linear programs. We significantly reduce the number of steps needed when the access rate of commodities is limited. We extend the algorithm to two important practical use cases: importance weights and piece-wise linear utility functions for commodities. Our experiments on synthetic and real networks show that our algorithms achieve a significant speedup and provide practical insights on the trade-off between fairness and throughput. Emilie Danna, Subhasree Mandal |
INFOCOM | 2 |