Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bibhuti B. Bhattacharya
dblp:85/2477
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software Measures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1992 |
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
software complexity metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software Measures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust regression · 0.0least squares · 0.0least absolute value estimation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software MeasuresabstractThe objective in the construction of models of software quality is to use measures that may be obtained relatively early in the software development life cycle to provide reasonable initial estimates of the quality of an evolving software system. Measures of software quality and software complexity to be used in this modeling process exhibit systematic departures of the normality assumptions of regression modeling. Two new estimation procedures are introduced, and their performances in the modeling of software quality from software complexity in terms of the predictive quality and the quality of fit are compared with those of the more traditional least squares and least absolute value estimation techniques. The two new estimation techniques did produce regression models with better quality of fit and predictive quality when applied to data obtained from two software development projects.> Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, John C. Munson, Bibhuti B. Bhattacharya, Gary D. Richardson |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |