Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanni Willenbrock
dblp:85/6806
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
array CGH segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
copy number analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
segmentation · 0.1cross-chromosome merging · 0.1classification · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analysesabstractMOTIVATION: Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allows detection and mapping of copy number of DNA segments. A challenge is to make inferences about the copy number structure of the genome. Several statistical methods have been proposed to determine genomic segments with different copy number levels. However, to date, no comprehensive comparison of various characteristics of these methods exists. Moreover, the segmentation results have not been utilized in downstream analyses. RESULTS: We describe a comparison of three popular and publicly available methods for the analysis of array CGH data and we demonstrate how segmentation results may be utilized in the downstream analyses such as testing and classification, yielding higher power and prediction accuracy. Since the methods operate on individual chromosomes, we also propose a novel procedure for merging segments across the genome, which results in an interpretable set of copy number levels, and thus facilitate identification of copy number alterations in each genome. AVAILABILITY: http://www.bioconductor.org Hanni Willenbrock, Jane Fridlyand |
Bioinform. | 1 |