Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanni Willenbrock

dblp:85/6806 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
array CGH segmentation
0.112005
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration detection
0.112005
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
copy number analysis
0.112005
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112005
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

segmentation · 0.1cross-chromosome merging · 0.1classification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses
abstract
MOTIVATION: Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allows detection and mapping of copy number of DNA segments. A challenge is to make inferences about the copy number structure of the genome. Several statistical methods have been proposed to determine genomic segments with different copy number levels. However, to date, no comprehensive comparison of various characteristics of these methods exists. Moreover, the segmentation results have not been utilized in downstream analyses. RESULTS: We describe a comparison of three popular and publicly available methods for the analysis of array CGH data and we demonstrate how segmentation results may be utilized in the downstream analyses such as testing and classification, yielding higher power and prediction accuracy. Since the methods operate on individual chromosomes, we also propose a novel procedure for merging segments across the genome, which results in an interpretable set of copy number levels, and thus facilitate identification of copy number alterations in each genome. AVAILABILITY: http://www.bioconductor.org
Hanni Willenbrock, Jane Fridlyand
Bioinform.1