Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Reina Uba

dblp:85/8686 · also Reina Käärik · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
business process modeling
0.212013
Business Process Model Merging: An Approach to Business Process Consolidation · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2013
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Fast detection of exact clones in business process model repositories
Marlon Dumas, Luciano García-Bañuelos, Marcello La Rosa, Reina Uba
Inf. Syst.4
2013 Business Process Model Merging: An Approach to Business Process Consolidation
abstract
This article addresses the problem of constructing consolidated business process models out of collections of process models that share common fragments. The article considers the construction of unions of multiple models (called merged models ) as well as intersections (called digests ). Merged models are intended for analysts who wish to create a model that subsumes a collection of process models -- typically representing variants of the same underlying process -- with the aim of replacing the variants with the merged model. Digests, on the other hand, are intended for analysts who wish to identify the most recurring fragments across a collection of process models, so that they can focus their efforts on optimizing these fragments. The article presents an algorithm for computing merged models and an algorithm for extracting digests from a merged model. The merging and digest extraction algorithms have been implemented and tested against collections of process models taken from multiple application domains. The tests show that the merging algorithm produces compact models and scales up to process models containing hundreds of nodes. Furthermore, a case study conducted in a large insurance company has demonstrated the usefulness of the merging and digest extraction operators in a practical setting.
Marcello La Rosa, Marlon Dumas, Reina Uba, Remco M. Dijkman
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.3
2011 Clone Detection in Repositories of Business Process Models
Reina Uba, Marlon Dumas, Luciano García-Bañuelos, Marcello La Rosa
BPM1
2011 Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation
Remco M. Dijkman, Marlon Dumas, Boudewijn F. van Dongen, Reina Uba, Jan Mendling
Inf. Syst.4
2010 Information Retrieval of Word Form Variants in Spoken Language Corpora Using Generalized Edit Distance
Siim Orasmaa, Reina Uba, Jaak Vilo, Tiit Hennoste
LREC2
2009 Aligning Business Process Models
abstract
This paper studies the following problem: given a pair of business process models, determine which elements in one model are related to which elements in the other model. This problem arises in the context of merging different versions or variants of a business process model or when comparing business process models in order to display their similarities and differences. The paper investigates two approaches to this alignment problem: one based purely on lexical matching of pairs of elements and another based on error-correcting graph matching. Using a set of models taken from real-life scenarios, the paper empirically shows that graph matching techniques yield a significantly higher precision than pure lexical matching, while achieving comparable recall.
Remco M. Dijkman, Marlon Dumas, Luciano García-Bañuelos, Reina Uba
EDOC4