Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Twigg

dblp:86/2480 · also Andy Twigg · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0009-0009-0582-0108ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Content delivery and video streaming · 29% Network measurement and analytics · 23% Internet architecture and protocols · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › network diffusion
epidemic dissemination
0.112008
Epidemic live streaming: optimal performance trade-offs · SIGMETRICS 2008
Content delivery and video streaming › peer-to-peer streaming
peer-to-peer live streaming
0.112008
Epidemic live streaming: optimal performance trade-offs · SIGMETRICS 2008
Internet architecture and protocols
overlay networks
0.112007
Randomized Decentralized Broadcasting Algorithms · INFOCOM 2007
Content delivery and video streaming
live streaming
0.012007
Randomized Decentralized Broadcasting Algorithms · INFOCOM 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1randomized local-control algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Locality-preserving allocations problems and coloured bin packing
Andrew Twigg, Eduardo C. Xavier
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2011 Stratified B-trees and Versioned Dictionaries
Andrew Twigg, Andrew Byde, Grzegorz Milos, Tim D. Moreton, John Wilkes, Tom Wilkie
HotStorage1
2010 Constrained-Path Labellings on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width
Bruno Courcelle, Andrew Twigg
Theory Comput. Syst.2
2008 Epidemic live streaming: optimal performance trade-offs
abstract
Several peer-to-peer systems for live streaming have been recently deployed (e.g. CoolStreaming, PPLive, SopCast). These all rely on distributed, epidemic-style dissemination mechanisms. Despite their popularity, the fundamental performance trade-offs of such mechanisms are still poorly understood. In this paper we propose several results that contribute to the understanding of such trade-offs.
Thomas Bonald, Laurent Massoulié, Fabien Mathieu, Diego Perino, Andrew Twigg
SIGMETRICS5
2008 Rate-optimal schemes for Peer-to-Peer live streaming
Laurent Massoulié, Andrew Twigg
Perform. Evaluation2
2007 Randomized Decentralized Broadcasting Algorithms
abstract
We consider the problem of broadcasting a live stream of data in an unstructured network. The broadcasting problem has been studied extensively for edge-capacitated networks. We give the first proof that whenever demand lambda + epsiv is feasible for epsiv > 0, a simple local-control algorithm is stable under demand lambda, and as a corollary a famous theorem of Edmonds. We then study the node-capacitated case and show a similar optimality result for the complete graph. We study through simulation the delay that users must wait in order to playback a video stream with a small number of skipped packets, and discuss the suitability of our algorithms for live video streaming.
Laurent Massoulié, Andrew Twigg, Christos Gkantsidis, Pablo Rodriguez 0001
INFOCOM2
2007 Compact Forbidden-Set Routing
Bruno Courcelle, Andrew Twigg
STACS2
2007 The complexity of fixed point models of trust in distributed networks
Karl Krukow, Andrew Twigg
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2005 Distributed Approximation of Fixed-Points in Trust Structures
abstract
We consider distributed algorithms for solving a range of problems in a framework for trust in large-scale distributed systems. The framework is based on the notion of trust structures; a set of 'trust-levels' with two distinct partial orderings. In the trust model, a global trust-state is defined as the least fixed-point of a collection of local policies of nodes in the network. We show that it is possible to compute the global trust-state using a simple, robust and totally asynchronous distributed-algorithm. We also consider a distributed notion of proof-carrying-requests as a means of approximating the least fixed-point, enabling sound reasoning about the global trust-state without computing the exact fixed-point. Our proof-carrying-request model is different than the notion of proof-of-compliance from traditional trust-management; in particular, all proofs are efficiently verifiable or easily rejected, but, in the worst case, may require as much communication as computing the actual trust-state itself
Karl Krukow, Andrew Twigg
ICDCS2