Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Mrózek

dblp:86/3415 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems
0.021992
A New Method for Discovering Rules from Examples in Expert Systems · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1992
Rough Sets and Dependency Analysis among Attributes in Computer Implementations of Expert's Inference Models · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1989
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule discovery
0.011992
A New Method for Discovering Rules from Examples in Expert Systems · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1992
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
rough set theory
0.011989
Rough Sets and Dependency Analysis among Attributes in Computer Implementations of Expert's Inference Models · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rough sets · 0.0dependency analysis · 0.0rule induction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Rough sets in hybrid methods for pattern recognition
abstract
The article shows how rough sets can be applied to improve the classification ability of a hybrid pattern recognition system. The system presented here consists of a feature extractor based on a computer-generated hologram (CGH) playing the role of a ring-wedge detector. Features extracted by it are shift, rotation, and scale invariant. Although they can be optimized, no method has been proposed in the literature. This article presents an original method of optimizing the feature extraction abilities of a CGH. The method uses rough set theory (RST) to measure the amount of essential information contained in the feature vector. This measure is used to define an objective function in the optimization process. Since RST-based factors are not differentiable, we use a nongradient approach for a search in the space of possible solutions. Finally, RST is used to determine decision rules for the classification of feature vectors. The alternative method of classification based on neural networks is also discussed. The whole method is illustrated by a system recognizing the class of speckle pattern images indicating the class of distortion of optical fibers. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Krzysztof A. Cyran, Adam Mrózek
Int. J. Intell. Syst.2
2000 Rough sets in hybrid methods for pattern recognition
abstract
Many papers describe hybrid methods used for pattern recognition. Such systems consist of an optical part, performing fast signal preprocessing, and a computer, analyzing preprocessed data. Here we present the method which uses for feature extraction the ring-wedge detectors (RWD) or computer generated holograms (CGH) serving as RWD. Features obtained in this way are shift, rotation, and scale invariant, but papers suggest that they can be still subject for further optimization. This article presents an original method for optimizing feature extraction abilities of CGH. This method uses rough set theory (RST) to measure the amount of essential information for the classification, preserved in feature vector. As there is no gradient direction information in factors defined by RST, we use for a space search a stochastic evolutionary approach. Finally, we use RST to determine decision rules for the feature vector classification. The whole method is illustrated by a system recognizing the speckle pattern images obtained as a result of interference of light going through a quasi-monomode optical fiber. As the conditions of interference differ when some kind of distortion of the optical fiber is produced, such a system can be used as a sensor of the pressure causing this distortion. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Krzysztof A. Cyran, Adam Mrózek
Int. J. Intell. Syst.2
1997 Knowledge Representation in Fuzzy and Rough Controllers
abstract
Alternative approaches to data processing, e.g., fuzzy set theory, rough set theory and neural networks, known collectively as ‘soft computing,’ have drawn significant interest from the scientific community. They have already found numerous applicati
Adam Mrózek, Leszek Plonka
Fundam. Informaticae1
1995 Rule-Based Stabilization of the Inverted Pendulum
abstract
The inverted pendulum poses serious problems for qualitative modeling methods, so it is a good benchmark to lest their performance. This paper shows how a new data analysis method known as rough set theory can be utilized to swing up and stabilize the pendulum. Our approach to this task consists of deriving control rules from the actions of a human operator stabilizing the pendulum and subsequently using them for automatic control. Rule derivation is based on the “learning from examples” principle and does not require knowledge of a quantitative model of the system.
Leszek Plonka, Adam Mrózek
Comput. Intell.2
1992 A New Method for Discovering Rules from Examples in Expert Systems
Adam Mrózek
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1
1989 Rough Sets and Dependency Analysis among Attributes in Computer Implementations of Expert's Inference Models
Adam Mrózek
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1