Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jia Yu 0001
dblp:86/3457-1
· DBLP profile ↗
20ranked-venue papers
13as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1340-6475ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 20 · 13 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
12 papers |
Indexing and storage engines · 37% Spatial and temporal data management · 21% Query processing and optimization · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines
learned index |
1.2 | 3 | 2020 | ALEX: An Updatable Adaptive Learned Index · SIGMOD Conference 2020 HERMIT in Action: Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism via Correlation Exploration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 Designing Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism by Exploiting Column Correlations · SIGMOD Conference 2019 |
Visualization and visual analytics
geospatial visualization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | GeoSparkViz: a cluster computing system for visualizing massive-scale geospatial data · VLDB J. 2021 Turbocharging Geospatial Visualization Dashboards via a Materialized Sampling Cube Approach · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Tabula in Action: A Sampling Middleware for Interactive Geospatial Visualization Dashboards · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 Turbocharging Geospatial Visualization Dashboards via a Materialized Sampling Cube Approach · ICDE 2020 |
Indexing and storage engines
secondary index |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | HERMIT in Action: Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism via Correlation Exploration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 Designing Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism by Exploiting Column Correlations · SIGMOD Conference 2019 |
High-performance computing
cluster computing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GeoSparkViz: a cluster computing system for visualizing massive-scale geospatial data · VLDB J. 2021 |
High-performance computing › scientific visualization
remote visualization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GeoSparkViz: a cluster computing system for visualizing massive-scale geospatial data · VLDB J. 2021 |
Indexing and storage engines › learned index
updatable learned index |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ALEX: An Updatable Adaptive Learned Index · SIGMOD Conference 2020 |
Visualization and visual analytics
interactive visualization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tabula in Action: A Sampling Middleware for Interactive Geospatial Visualization Dashboards · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Information retrieval › indexing › index compression
index pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Designing Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism by Exploiting Column Correlations · SIGMOD Conference 2019 |
Information retrieval › web search
location-based search |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Demonstrating Spindra: A Geographic Knowledge Graph Management System · ICDE 2019 |
Query processing and optimization
range query |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Designing Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism by Exploiting Column Correlations · SIGMOD Conference 2019 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Geospatial Data Management in Apache Spark: A Tutorial · ICDE 2019 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial databases |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GeoSparkViz in Action: A Data System with Built-in Support for Geospatial Visualization · ICDE 2019 |
Data stream processing
spatial data streams |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Geospatial Data Management in Apache Spark: A Tutorial · ICDE 2019 |
Indexing and storage engines › succinct data structures
lightweight index |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hippo in Action: Scalable Indexing of a Billion New York City Taxi Trips and Beyond · ICDE 2017 |
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial query processing
spatial join |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial data · ICDE 2016 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial query processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial data · ICDE 2016 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial data processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | GeoSparkViz: a cluster computing system for visualizing massive-scale geospatial data · VLDB J. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cluster computing · 1.5sampling cube · 0.9materialized sampling · 0.9accuracy loss function · 0.9soft functional dependency · 0.8curve fitting · 0.8page grouping · 0.5histogram-based page summaries · 0.5machine learning · 0.4map visualization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Coincident Data Discovery Engine: A Portal for Global-Scale Cross-Platform Satellite Data SearchabstractCoincident satellite data refer to remote sensing observations from different platforms that capture the same geographic location within a short temporal window. Such data enable multi-modal and multi-view analysis—particularly for dynamic systems like the Arctic, where images captured just hours apart can reflect vastly different conditions (e.g., moving sea ice), complicating data integration. However, acquiring coincident data from different satellite platforms remains labor-intensive and computationally demanding. Finding coincident data is challenging due to separate query systems, inconsistent file formats, and the lack of built-in tools to compute cross-platform time differences. Researchers often settle for loosely aligned observations, compromising temporal alignment precision and analysis quality. To address this challenge, we introduce the Coincident Data Discovery Engine (CoDD), a platform designed to facilitate the discovery and access to spatially and temporally coincident remote sensing data across multiple platforms. CoDD provides data from seven widely used satellite missions spanning optical, SAR, and LiDAR modalities, with a maximum temporal gap of 72 hours and temporal granularity down to one second. The platform features an intuitive user interface that enables efficient querying, visualization, and download of coincident data. CoDD is already supporting diverse ongoing research such as Arctic change monitoring, satellite product validation, and ground truth generation for super-resolution models. Yiqun Xie, Leo Du, Jia Yu 0001, Kyle Duncan, Sinéad Louise Farrell, Zhili Li, Kangyang Chai |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 4 |
| 2021 | GeoSparkViz: a cluster computing system for visualizing massive-scale geospatial data
Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
VLDB J. | 1 |
| 2020 | Turbocharging Geospatial Visualization Dashboards via a Materialized Sampling Cube ApproachabstractIn this paper, we present a middleware framework that runs on top of a SQL data system with the purpose of increasing the interactivity of geospatial visualization dashboards. The proposed system adopts a sampling cube approach that stores pre-materialized spatial samples and allows users to define their own accuracy loss function such that the produced samples can be used for various user-defined visualization tasks. The system ensures that the difference between the sample fed into the visualization dashboard and the raw query answer never exceeds the user-specified loss threshold. To reduce the number of cells in the sampling cube and hence mitigate the initialization time and memory utilization, the system employs two main strategies: (1) a partially materialized cube to only materialize local samples of those queries for which the global sample (the sample drawn from the entire dataset) exceeds the required accuracy loss threshold. (2) a sample selection technique that finds similarities between different local samples and only persists a few representative samples. Based on the extensive experimental evaluation, Tabula can bring down the total data-to-visualization time (including both data-system and visualization times) of a heat map generated over 700 million taxi rides to 600 milliseconds with 250 meters user-defined accuracy loss. Besides, Tabula costs up to two orders of magnitude less memory footprint (e.g., only 800 MB for the running example) and one order of magnitude less initialization time than the fully materialized sampling cube. Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2020 | ALEX: An Updatable Adaptive Learned IndexabstractRecent work on "learned indexes" has changed the way we look at the decades-old field of DBMS indexing. The key idea is that indexes can be thought of as "models" that predict the position of a key in a dataset. Indexes can, thus, be learned. The original work by Kraska et al. shows that a learned index beats a B+ tree by a factor of up to three in search time and by an order of magnitude in memory footprint. However, it is limited to static, read-only workloads. In this paper, we present a new learned index called ALEX which addresses practical issues that arise when implementing learned indexes for workloads that contain a mix of point lookups, short range queries, inserts, updates, and deletes. ALEX effectively combines the core insights from learned indexes with proven storage and indexing techniques to achieve high performance and low memory footprint. On read-only workloads, ALEX beats the learned index from Kraska et al. by up to 2.2X on performance with up to 15X smaller index size. Across the spectrum of read-write workloads, ALEX beats B+ trees by up to 4.1X while never performing worse, with up to 2000X smaller index size. We believe ALEX presents a key step towards making learned indexes practical for a broader class of database workloads with dynamic updates. Jialin Ding 0001, Umar Farooq Minhas, Jia Yu 0001, Chi Wang 0001, Jaeyoung Do, Yinan Li 0009, Hantian Zhang, Badrish Chandramouli, Johannes Gehrke, Donald Kossmann, David B. Lomet, Tim Kraska |
SIGMOD Conference | 3 |
| 2020 | Dissecting GeoSparkSim: a scalable microscopic road network traffic simulator in Apache Spark
Jia Yu 0001, Zishan Fu, Mohamed Sarwat |
Distributed Parallel Databases | 1 |
| 2020 | Tabula in Action: A Sampling Middleware for Interactive Geospatial Visualization DashboardsabstractIn this paper, we demonstrate Tabula, a middleware that sits between the data system and the geospatial visualization dashboard to increase user interactivity. The proposed system adopts a sampling cube approach that stores prematerialized spatial samples and allows data scientists to define their own accuracy loss function such that the produced samples can be used for various user-defined visualization tasks. The system ensures that the difference between the sample fed into the dashboard and the raw query answer never exceeds the user-specified loss threshold. For demonstration purposes, we connect Apache Zeppelin, a visualization dashboard, to the system and show how Tabula accelerates interactive visualizations on NYC Taxi Trip data, Yelp review data and San Diego Smart Streetlights data. Jia Yu 0001, Kanchan Chowdhury, Mohamed Sarwat |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2019 | Demonstrating Spindra: A Geographic Knowledge Graph Management SystemabstractKnowledge Graphs are widely used to store facts about real-world entities and events. With the ubiquity of spatial data, vertexes or edges in knowledge graphs can possess spatial location attributes side by side with other non-spatial attributes. For instance, as of June 2018 the Wikidata knowledge graph contains 48; 547; 142 data items (i.e., vertexes) to date and ≈13% of them have spatial location attributes. The co-existence of the graph and spatial data in the same geographic knowledge graph allows users to search the graph with local intent. Many location-based services such as UberEats, GrubHub, and Yelp already employ similar knowledge graphs to enhance the location search experience for their end-users. In this paper, we demonstrate a system, namely Spindra, that provides efficient management of geographic knowledge graphs. We demonstrate the system using an interactive map-based web interface that allows users to issue location-aware search queries over the WikiData knowledge graph. The Front end will then visualize the returned geographic knowledge to the user using OpenStreetMaps. Yuhan Sun 0006, Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2019 | Geospatial Data Management in Apache Spark: A TutorialabstractThe volume of spatial data increases at a staggering rate. This tutorial comprehensively studies how existing works extend Apache Spark to uphold massive-scale spatial data. During this 1.5 hour tutorial, we first provide a background introduction of the characteristics of spatial data and the history of distributed data management systems. A follow-up section presents the common approaches used by the practitioners to extend Spark and introduces the vital components in a generic spatial data management system. The third, fourth and fifth sections then discuss the ongoing efforts and experience in spatial-temporal data, spatial data analytics and streaming spatial data, respectively. The sixth part finally concludes this tutorial to help the audience better grasp the overall content and points out future research directions. Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2019 | GeoSparkViz in Action: A Data System with Built-in Support for Geospatial VisualizationabstractVisualizing data on maps is deemed a powerful tool for data scientists to make sense of geospatial data. The geospatial map visualization (abbr. MapViz) process first loads the designated geospatial data, processes the data and then applies the map visualization effect. Guaranteeing detailed and accurate geospatial MapViz (e.g., at multiple zoom levels) requires extremely high-resolution maps. Classic solutions suffer from limited computation resources while scalable MapViz system architectures are not able to co-optimize the data management and visualization phases in the same system. This paper demonstrates GeoSparkViz, a full-fledged system that allows the user to load, prepare, integrate and execute MapViz tasks in the same system. For demonstration purpose, we implemented a web interface using a node.js web server, Baidu echarts library, and MapBox on top of GeoSparkViz to visually explore patterns in the New York City Taxi Trips dataset. The demonstration scenarios show how the data preparation and map visualization phases are combined in GeoSparkViz. Jia Yu 0001, Anique Tahir, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2019 | Building a Large-Scale Microscopic Road Network Traffic Simulator in Apache SparkabstractRoad network traffic data has been widely studied by researchers and practitioners in different areas such as urban planning, traffic prediction, and spatial-temporal databases. For instance, researchers use such data to evaluate the impact of road network changes. Unfortunately, collecting large-scale high-quality urban traffic data requires tremendous efforts because participating vehicles must install GPS receivers and administrators must continuously monitor these devices. There has been a number of urban traffic simulators trying to generate such data with different features. However, they suffer from two critical issues (1) scalability: most of them only offer single-machine solution which is not adequate to produce large-scale data. Some simulators can generate traffic in parallel but do not well balance the load among machines in a cluster. (2) granularity: many simulators do not consider microscopic traffic situations including traffic lights, lane changing, car following. In the paper, we propose GeoSparkSim, a scalable traffic simulator which extends Apache Spark to generate large-scale road network traffic datasets with microscopic traffic simulation. The proposed system seamlessly integrates with a Spark-based spatial data management system, GeoSpark, to deliver a holistic approach that allows data scientists to simulate, analyze and visualize largescale urban traffic data. To implement microscopic traffic models, GeoSparkSim employs a simulation-aware vehicle partitioning method to partition vehicles among different machines such that each machine has a balanced workload. The experimental analysis shows that GeoSparkSim can simulate the movements of 200 thousand vehicles over a very large road network (250 thousand road junctions and 300 thousand road segments). Zishan Fu, Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
MDM | 2 |
| 2019 | Designing Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism by Exploiting Column CorrelationsabstractDatabase administrators construct secondary indexes on data tables to accelerate query processing in relational database management systems (RDBMSs). These indexes are built on top of the most frequently queried columns according to the data statistics. Unfortunately, maintaining multiple secondary indexes in the same database can be extremely space consuming, causing significant performance degradation due to the potential exhaustion of memory space. In this paper, we demonstrate that there exist many opportunities to exploit column correlations for accelerating data access. We propose HERMIT, a succinct secondary indexing mechanism for modern RDBMSs. HERMIT judiciously leverages the rich soft functional dependencies hidden among columns to prune out redundant structures for indexed key access. Instead of building a complete index that stores every single entry in the key columns, HERMIT navigates any incoming key access queries to an existing index built on the correlated columns. This is achieved through the Tiered Regression Search Tree (TRS-Tree), a succinct, ML-enhanced data structure that performs fast curve fitting to adaptively and dynamically capture both column correlations and outliers. Our extensive experimental study in two different RDBMSs have confirmed that HERMIT can significantly reduce space consumption with limited performance overhead, especially when supporting complex range queries. Yingjun Wu, Jia Yu 0001, Yuanyuan Tian 0001, Richard Sidle, Ron Barber |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2019 | Demonstrating GeoSparkSim: A Scalable Microscopic Road Network Traffic Simulator Based on Apache SparkabstractRoad network traffic data has been widely studied by researchers and practitioners in different areas such as urban planning, traffic prediction and spatial-temporal databases. The existing urban traffic simulators suffer from two critical issues (1) scalability: most of them only offer single-machine solutions which are not adequate to produce large-scale data. Some simulators can generate traffic in parallel but do not well balance the load among machines in a cluster. (2) granularity: many simulators do not consider microscopic traffic situations including traffic lights, lane changing, and car following. In the paper, we propose GeoSparkSim, a scalable traffic simulator which extends Apache Spark to generate large-scale road network traffic datasets with microscopic traffic simulation. The proposed system seamlessly integrates with a Spark-based spatial data management system, GeoSpark, to deliver a holistic approach that allows data scientists to simulate, analyze and visualize large-scale urban traffic data. To implement microscopic traffic models, GeoSparkSim employs a simulation-aware vehicle partitioning method to partition vehicles among different machines such that each machine has a balanced workload. A full-fledged prototype of GeoSparkSim is implemented in Apache Spark. In this demonstration, we will show the attendees how to issue GeoSparkSim simulation tasks via the user interface, visualize simulated vehicle movements, and monitor the backend Spark cluster status. Zishan Fu, Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
SSTD | 2 |
| 2019 | Spatial data management in apache spark: the GeoSpark perspective and beyond
Jia Yu 0001, Zongsi Zhang, Mohamed Sarwat |
GeoInformatica | 1 |
| 2019 | HERMIT in Action: Succinct Secondary Indexing Mechanism via Correlation ExplorationabstractDatabase administrators construct secondary indexes on data tables to accelerate query processing in relational database management systems (RDBMSs). These indexes are built on top of the most frequently queried columns according to the data statistics. Unfortunately, maintaining multiple secondary indexes in the same database can be extremely space consuming, causing significant performance degradation due to the potential exhaustion of memory space. However, we find that there indeed exist many opportunities to save storage space by exploiting column correlations. We recently introduced Hermit, a succinct secondary indexing mechanism for modern RDBMSs. Hermit judiciously leverages the rich soft functional dependencies hidden among columns to prune out redundant structures for indexed key access. instead of building a complete index that stores every single entry in the key columns, Hermit navigates any incoming key access queries to an existing index built on the correlated columns. This is achieved through the Tiered Regression Search Tree (TRS-Tree), a succinct, ML-enhanced data structure that performs fast curve fitting to adaptively and dynamically capture both column correlations and outliers. In this demonstration, we showcase Hermit's appealing characteristics. we not only demonstrate that Hermit can significantly reduce space consumption with limited performance overhead in terms of query response time and index maintenance time, but also explain in detail the rationale behind Hermit's high efficiency using interactive online query processing examples. Yingjun Wu, Jia Yu 0001, Yuanyuan Tian 0001, Richard Sidle, Ron Barber |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2018 | GeoSparkViz: a scalable geospatial data visualization framework in the apache spark ecosystemabstractData Visualization allows users to summarize, analyze and reason about data. A map visualization tool first loads the designated geospatial data, processes the data and then applies the map visualization effect. Guaranteeing detailed and accurate geospatial map visualization (e.g., at multiple zoom levels) requires extremely high-resolution maps. Classic solutions suffer from limited computation resources and hence take a tremendous amount of time to generate maps for large-scale geospatial data. Jia Yu 0001, Zongsi Zhang, Mohamed Sarwat |
SSDBM | 1 |
| 2017 | Hippo in Action: Scalable Indexing of a Billion New York City Taxi Trips and BeyondabstractThe paper demonstrates Hippo a lightweight database indexing scheme that significantly reduces the storage and maintenance overhead without compromising much on the query execution performance. Hippo stores disk page ranges instead of tuple pointers in the indexed table to reduce the storage space occupied by the index. It maintains simplified histograms that represent the data distribution and adopts a page grouping technique that groups contiguous pages into page ranges based on the similarity of their index key attribute distributions. When a query is issued, Hippo leverages the page ranges and histogram-based page summaries to recognize those pages such that their tuples are guaranteed not to satisfy the query predicates and then inspects the remaining pages. We demonstrate Hippo using a billion NYC taxi trip records. Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWaOK2-9k9A. Jia Yu 0001, Raha Moraffah, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2017 | Indexing the Pickup and Drop-Off Locations of NYC Taxi Trips in PostgreSQL - Lessons from the Road
Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
SSTD | 1 |
| 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial dataabstractThis paper demonstrates GEOSPARK a cluster computing framework for developing and processing large-scale spatial data analytics programs. GEOSPARK consists of three main layers: Apache Spark Layer, Spatial RDD Layer and Spatial Query Processing Layer. Apache Spark Layer provides basic Apache Spark functionalities as regular RDD operations. Spatial RDD Layer consists of three novel Spatial Resilient Distributed Datasets (SRDDs) which extend regular Apache Spark RDD to support geometrical and spatial objects with data partitioning and indexing. Spatial Query Processing Layer executes spatial queries (e.g., Spatial Join) on SRDDs. The dynamic status of SRDDs and spatial operations are visualized by GEOSPARK monitoring map interface. We demonstrate GEOSPARK using three spatial analytics applications (spatial aggregation, autocorrelation and co-location) to show how users can easily define their spatial analytics tasks and efficiently process such tasks on large-scale spatial data at interactive performance. Jia Yu 0001, Jinxuan Wu, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2016 | Two Birds, One Stone: A Fast, yet Lightweight, Indexing Scheme for Modern Database SystemsabstractClassic database indexes (e.g., B + -Tree), though speed up queries, suffer from two main drawbacks: (1) An index usually yields 5% to 15% additional storage overhead which results in non-ignorable dollar cost in big data scenarios especially when deployed on modern storage devices. (2) Maintaining an index incurs high latency because the DBMS has to locate and update those index pages affected by the underlying table changes. This paper proposes Hippo a fast, yet scalable, database indexing approach. It significantly shrinks the index storage and mitigates maintenance overhead without compromising much on the query execution performance. Hippo stores disk page ranges instead of tuple pointers in the indexed table to reduce the storage space occupied by the index. It maintains simplified histograms that represent the data distribution and adopts a page grouping technique that groups contiguous pages into page ranges based on the similarity of their index key attribute distributions. When a query is issued, Hippo leverages the page ranges and histogram-based page summaries to recognize those pages such that their tuples are guaranteed not to satisfy the query predicates and inspects the remaining pages. Experiments based on real and synthetic datasets show that Hippo occupies up to two orders of magnitude less storage space than that of the B + -Tree while still achieving comparable query execution performance to that of the B + -Tree for 0.1% -- 1% selectivity factors. Also, the experiments show that Hippo outperforms BRIN (Block Range Index) in executing queries with various selectivity factors. Furthermore, Hippo achieves up to three orders of magnitude less maintenance overhead and up to an order of magnitude higher throughput (for hybrid query/update workloads) than its counterparts. Jia Yu 0001, Mohamed Sarwat |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2015 | GeoSpark: a cluster computing framework for processing large-scale spatial dataabstractThis paper introduces GeoSpark an in-memory cluster computing framework for processing large-scale spatial data. GeoSpark consists of three layers: Apache Spark Layer, Spatial RDD Layer and Spatial Query Processing Layer. Apache Spark Layer provides basic Spark functionalities that include loading / storing data to disk as well as regular RDD operations. Spatial RDD Layer consists of three novel Spatial Resilient Distributed Datasets (SRDDs) which extend regular Apache Spark RDDs to support geometrical and spatial objects. GeoSpark provides a geometrical operations library that accesses Spatial RDDs to perform basic geometrical operations (e.g., Overlap, Intersect). System users can leverage the newly defined SRDDs to effectively develop spatial data processing programs in Spark. The Spatial Query Processing Layer efficiently executes spatial query processing algorithms (e.g., Spatial Range, Join, KNN query) on SRDDs. GeoSpark also allows users to create a spatial index (e.g., R-tree, Quad-tree) that boosts spatial data processing performance in each SRDD partition. Preliminary experiments show that GeoSpark achieves better run time performance than its Hadoop-based counterparts (e.g., SpatialHadoop). Jia Yu 0001, Jinxuan Wu, Mohamed Sarwat |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 1 |