Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Thomas C. Hales

dblp:86/3532 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
11as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 9 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 71% Computational geometry · 14% Coding theory · 14%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
automated theorem proving
0.112007
Some Methods of Problem Solving in Elementary Geometry · LICS 2007
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
formal proof
0.112007
Some Methods of Problem Solving in Elementary Geometry · LICS 2007
Computational geometry
discrete geometry
0.012001
Sphere packings and generative · SCG 2001
Coding theory
sphere packing
0.012001
Sphere packings and generative · SCG 2001
Automated reasoning and model checking
computer-aided proofs
0.012001
Sphere packings and generative · SCG 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric problem solving · 0.1automated proof · 0.1computer-assisted verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 A Revision of the Proof of the Kepler Conjecture
Thomas C. Hales, John Harrison 0001, Sean McLaughlin, Tobias Nipkow, Steven Obua, Roland Zumkeller
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2007 Some Methods of Problem Solving in Elementary Geometry
abstract
Many elementary problems in geometry arise as part of the proof of the Kepler conjecture on sphere packings. In the original proof, most of these problems were solved by hand. This article investigates the methods that were used in the original proof and describes a number of other methods that might be used to automate the proofs of these problems. A companion article presents the collection of elementary problems in geometry for which automated proofs are sought. This article is a contribution to the Flyspeck project, which aims to give a complete formal proof of the Kepler conjecture.
Thomas C. Hales
LICS1
2006 Historical Overview of the Kepler Conjecture
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2006 Sphere Packing, III. Extremal Cases
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2006 Sphere Packing, IV. Detailed Bounds
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2006 Sphere Packings, VI. Tame Graphs and Linear Programs
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2006 A Formulation of the Kepler Conjecture
Thomas C. Hales, Samuel P. Ferguson
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2001 Sphere packings and generative
abstract
In 1998, the oldest problem in discrete geometry, the 400-year old Kep ler conjecture, was solved. The conjecture asserts that the familiar cannonball packing of balls achieves the greatest density of any possible packing. The proof of the conjecture was unusually long, requiring nearly 300 pages of careful reasoning, 3 gigabytes of stored data, and 40,000 lines of specialized computer code. The computer verifications required for the proof were carried out over a period of years.
Thomas C. Hales
SCG1
2001 The Honeycomb Conjecture
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
1997 Sphere Packings, II
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
1997 Sphere Packings, I
Thomas C. Hales
Discret. Comput. Geom.1