Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keith Playford

dblp:86/3928 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › language design
language extension
0.012001
The Java Syntactic Extender · OOPSLA 2001
Programming languages and type systems › metaprogramming
macro systems
0.012001
The Java Syntactic Extender · OOPSLA 2001
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
multiple inheritance
0.011996
A Monotonic Superclass Linearization for Dylan · OOPSLA 1996
Programming languages and type systems
language design
0.012001
The Java Syntactic Extender · OOPSLA 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

macro expansion · 0.0class hierarchy analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 The Java Syntactic Extender
abstract
The ability to extend a language with new syntactic forms is a powerful tool. A sufficiently flexible macro system allows programmers to build from a common base towards a language designed specifically for their problem domain. However, macro facilities that are integrated, capable, and at the same time simple enough to be widely used have been limited to the Lisp family of languages to date. In this paper we introduce a macro facility, called the Java Syntactic Extender (JSE), with the superior power and ease of use of Lisp macro sytems, but for Java, a language with a more conventional algebraic syntax. The design is based on the Dylan macro system, but exploits Java's compilation model to offer a full procedural macro engine. In other words, syntax expanders may be implemented in, and so use all the facilities of, the full Java language
Jonathan Bachrach, Keith Playford
OOPSLA2
1996 A Monotonic Superclass Linearization for Dylan
abstract
Object-oriented languages with multiple inheritance and automatic conflict resolution typically use a linearization of superclasses to determine which version of a property to inherit when several superclasses provide definitions. Recent work has defined several desirable characteristics for linearizations, the most important being monotonicity, which prohibits inherited properties from skipping over direct superclasses. Combined with Dylan's sealing mechanism, a monotonic linearization enables some compile-time method selection that would otherwise be impossible in the absence of a closed-world assumption.The Dylan linearization is monotonic, easily described, strictly observes local precedence order, and produces the same ordering as CLOS when that is monotonic. We present an implementation based on merging and a survey of class heterarchies from several large programs, analyzing where commonly used linearizations differ.
Kim Barrett, Bob Cassels, Paul Haahr, David A. Moon, Keith Playford, P. Tucker Withington
OOPSLA5