Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Jeremy Tantrum

dblp:86/4598 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.122003
Assessment and pruning of hierarchical model based clustering · KDD 2003
Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation · KDD 2002
Data mining › clustering
model-based clustering
0.122003
Assessment and pruning of hierarchical model based clustering · KDD 2003
Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation · KDD 2002
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.012002
Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation · KDD 2002
Data mining › clustering
large-scale clustering
0.012002
Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation · KDD 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixture model · 0.0bayesian information criterion · 0.0refractionation · 0.0fractionation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation
Jeremy Tantrum, Alejandro Murua, Werner Stuetzle
Inf. Syst.1
2003 Assessment and pruning of hierarchical model based clustering
abstract
The goal of clustering is to identify distinct groups in a dataset. The basic idea of model-based clustering is to approximate the data density by a mixture model, typically a mixture of Gaussians, and to estimate the parameters of the component densities, the mixing fractions, and the number of components from the data. The number of distinct groups in the data is then taken to be the number of mixture components, and the observations are partitioned into clusters (estimates of the groups) using Bayes ’ rule. If the groups are well separated and look Gaussian, then the resulting clusters will indeed tend to be “distinct ” in the most common sense of the word- contiguous, densely populated areas of feature space, separated by contiguous, relatively empty regions. If the groups are not Gaussian, however, this correspondence may break down; an isolated group with a non-elliptical distribution, for example, may be modeled by not one, but several mixture components, and the corresponding clusters will no longer be well separated. We present methods for assessing the degree of separation between the components of a mixture model and between the corresponding clusters. We also propose an algorithm for pruning the cluster tree generated by hierarchical model-based clustering. The algorithm starts with the tree corresponding to the mixture model chosen by the Bayesian Information Criterion. It then progressively merges clusters that do not appear to correspond to different modes of the data density.
Jeremy Tantrum, Alejandro Murua, Werner Stuetzle
KDD1
2002 Hierarchical model-based clustering of large datasets through fractionation and refractionation
abstract
The goal of clustering is to identify distinct groups in a dataset. Compared to non-parametric clustering methods like complete linkage, hierarchical model-based clustering has the advantage of offering a way to estimate the number of groups present in the data. However, its computational cost is quadratic in the number of items to be clustered, and it is therefore not applicable to large problems. We review an idea called Fractionation, originally conceived by Cutting, Karger, Pedersen and Tukey for non-parametric hierarchical clustering of large datasets, and describe an adaptation of Fractionation to model-based clustering. A further extension, called Refractionation, leads to a procedure that can be successful even in the difficult situation where there are large numbers of small groups.
Jeremy Tantrum, Alejandro Murua, Werner Stuetzle
KDD1