Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henning Riedesel

dblp:86/7970 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
compound classification
0.112010
Exploring classification strategies with the CoEPrA 2006 contest · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug design
0.112010
Exploring classification strategies with the CoEPrA 2006 contest · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted biased regression · 0.1regression-based classification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Exploring classification strategies with the CoEPrA 2006 contest
abstract
MOTIVATION: In silico methods to classify compounds as potential drugs that bind to a specific target become increasingly important for drug design. To build classification devices training sets of drugs with known activities are needed. For many such classification problems, not only qualitative but also quantitative information of a specific property (e.g. binding affinity) is available. The latter can be used to build a regression scheme to predict this property for new compounds. Predicting a compound property explicitly is generally more difficult than classifying that the property lies below or above a given threshold value. Hence, an indirect classification that is based on regression may lead to poorer results than a direct classification scheme. In fact, initially researchers are only interested to classify compounds as potential drugs. The activities of these compounds are subsequently measured in wet lab. RESULTS: We propose a novel approach that uses available quantitative information directly for classification rather than first using a regression scheme. It uses a new type of loss function called weighted biased regression. Application of this method to four widely studied datasets of the CoEPrA contest (Comparative Evaluation of Prediction Algorithms, http://coepra.org) shows that it can outperform simple classification methods that do not make use of this additional quantitative information. AVAILABILITY: A stand alone application is available at the webpage http://agknapp.chemie.fu-berlin.de/agknapp/index.php?menu=software&page=PeptideClassifier that can be used to build a model for a peptide training set to be submitted.
Ozgur Demir-Kavuk, Henning Riedesel, Ernst-Walter Knapp
Bioinform.2