Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Vogl

dblp:87/1516 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 70% Computational photography and imaging · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality
augmented reality
0.112008
Optical free-form surfaces in off-axis head-worn display design · ISMAR 2008
Virtual and augmented reality › immersive display
head-mounted display
0.112008
Optical free-form surfaces in off-axis head-worn display design · ISMAR 2008
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design
optical design
0.112008
Optical free-form surfaces in off-axis head-worn display design · ISMAR 2008
Virtual and augmented reality › augmented reality
mobile augmented reality
0.012008
Optical free-form surfaces in off-axis head-worn display design · ISMAR 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

opto-mechanical packaging · 0.1free-form optics fabrication · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Recognition of Paper-Based Conceptual Models Captured Under Uncontrolled Conditions
abstract
Today, modeling and subsequent digital model representations are essential constituents in collaborative endeavors on organizational change. Once created, models need to be digitized for shared stakeholder understanding and further processing. Whenever paper serves as carrier medium, it is likely to disrupt further processing, elicitation, and modeling. While digital environments support transformation processes in collaborative modeling from its very beginning, the necessary technical infrastructure still might hamper situated capturing of models. Hence, this contribution aims to reduce the need for sophisticated technical components by enabling stakeholders to capture their paper-based models in a situation-sensitive way. We present a system that enables capturing paper-based models with mundane technical means by end users under uncontrolled conditions. We describe the components developed for recognition of these models and embed it in a mixed-modality workflow supported by a tabletop interfacing a web platform for further processing. As our empirical evidence demonstrates, this approach enables both situated and error-tolerant capturing of hand-drawn conceptual models by individual users. Moreover, it can be integrated with more sophisticated IT-based modeling tools for further digital processing.
Stefan Oppl, Christian Stary, Simon Vogl
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst.3
2008 Optical free-form surfaces in off-axis head-worn display design
abstract
Head-worn displays are becoming a viable visual display option for mobile augmented reality. In this paper, we highlight the challenges and some recent progress towards compact and lightweight head-worn displays tending towards the eyeglass form factor. Single and dual-element eyeglass display designs that leverage the advances in free-form optics fabrication technology will be presented. There are three new contributions in this paper: first, we present a single-element eyeglass display design and the fabricated mirror prototype; second, we present our second generation dual-element eyeglass display design with the revised opto-mechanical packaging; third, we present our initial studies on the field of view limit with an 8 mm pupil for the dual-element design.
Ozan Cakmakci, Sophie Vo, Simon Vogl, Rupert Spindelbalker, Alois Ferscha, Jannick P. Rolland
ISMAR3