Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jens Oehlerking

dblp:87/1596 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
search-based software testing
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019
Software testing
simulation-based testing
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019
Software testing
test generation
0.412019
Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications · ASE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Scenario-based threat metric evaluation based on the highd dataset
abstract
Scenario-based approaches have gained popularity in the context of automated vehicles. As in any model-based approach, validation to real data needs to be considered. This work studies concrete scenarios based on real data from a large-scale and open road user trajectory dataset. In particular, we detail on cut-ins and (hard) braking maneuvers and study them based on existing threat metrics. In this work, we present the complete workflow starting from the pre-processing and validation of the data, the definition of concrete scenarios based on how we extract them from the dataset and their evaluation based on several threat metrics. We identify peculiarities of the dataset itself, as well as of the driving behavior of vehicles therein. As this work relies on an open dataset, results can be reproduced and readily compared.
Patrick Schneider, Martin Butz, Christian Heinzemann, Jens Oehlerking, Matthias Woehrle
IV4
2019 Experience Paper: Search-Based Testing in Automated Driving Control Applications
abstract
Automated test generation and evaluation in simulation environments is a key technology for verification of automated driving (AD) applications. Search-based testing (SBT) is an approach for automated test generation that leverages optimization to efficiently generate interesting concrete tests from abstract test descriptions. In this experience paper, we report on our observations after successfully applying SBT to AD control applications in several use cases with different characteristics. Based on our experiences, we derive a number of lessons learned that we consider important for the adoption of SBT methods and tools in industrial settings. The key lesson is that SBT finds relevant errors and provides valuable feedback to the developers, but requires tool support for writing specifications.
Christoph Gladisch, Thomas Heinz 0001, Christian Heinzemann, Jens Oehlerking, Anne von Vietinghoff, Tim Pfitzer
ASE4
2019 Model Conformance for Cyber-Physical Systems: A Survey
abstract
Model-based development is an important paradigm for developing cyber-physical systems (CPS). The underlying assumption is that the functional behavior of a model is related to the behavior of a more concretized model or the real system. A formal definition of such a relation is called conformance relation. There are a variety of conformance relations, and the question arises of how to select a conformance relation for the development of CPS. The contribution of this article is a survey of the definitions and algorithms of conformance relations for CPS. Additionally, the article compares several conformance relations and provides guidance on which relation to select for specific problems. Finally, we discuss how to select inputs for testing conformance.
Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, Matthias Woehrle, Matthias Althoff
ACM Trans. Cyber Phys. Syst.2
2017 Provably safe motion of mobile robots in human environments
abstract
Mobile robots operating in a shared environment with pedestrians are required to move provably safe to avoid harming pedestrians. Current approaches like safety fields use conservative obstacle models for guaranteeing safety, which leads to degraded performance in populated environments. In this paper, we introduce an online verification approach that uses information about the current pedestrian velocities to compute possible occupancies based on a kinematic model of pedestrian motion. We demonstrate that our method reduces the need for stopping while retaining safety guarantees, and thus goals are reached between 1.4 and 3.5 times faster than the standard ROS navigation stack in the tested scenarios.
Stefan B. Liu, Hendrik Roehm, Christian Heinzemann, Ingo Lütkebohle, Jens Oehlerking, Matthias Althoff
IROS5
2016 STL Model Checking of Continuous and Hybrid Systems
Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, Thomas Heinz 0001, Matthias Althoff
ATVA2
2016 Reachset Conformance Testing of Hybrid Automata
abstract
Industrial-sized hybrid systems are typically not amenable to formal verification techniques. For this reason, a common approach is to formally verify abstractions of (parts of) the original system. However, we need to show that this abstraction conforms to the actual system implementation including its physical dynamics. In particular, verified properties of the abstract system need to transfer to the implementation. To this end, we introduce a formal conformance relation, called reachset conformance, which guarantees transference of safety properties, while being a weaker relation than the existing trace inclusion conformance. Based on this formal relation, we present a conformance testing method which allows us to tune the trade-off between accuracy and computational load. Additionally, we present a test selection algorithm that uses a coverage measure to reduce the number of test cases for conformance testing. We experimentally show the benefits of our novel techniques based on an example from autonomous driving.
Hendrik Roehm, Jens Oehlerking, Matthias Woehrle, Matthias Althoff
HSCC2
2009 A Decompositional Proof Scheme for Automated Convergence Proofs of Stochastic Hybrid Systems
Jens Oehlerking, Oliver E. Theel
ATVA1
2009 Decompositional Construction of Lyapunov Functions for Hybrid Systems
Jens Oehlerking, Oliver E. Theel
HSCC1
2005 Towards Push-of-a-Button Stability Verification for Discrete-Time Hybrid Systems
abstract
Stability is an important system property. In this paper we examine the steps toward fully automated stability verification for a class of discrete-time hybrid systems. These systems are hybrid in the sense that they can have several modes with possibly different discrete-time dynamics. For systems with affine discrete-time dynamics in each mode, we employ a method that is based on Lyapunov theory and reduces the verification task to convex optimization. We detail the steps that are needed for automatic stability verification using this method: 1) choice of a state space partitioning 2) calculation of possible transitions between the different regions of the partitioning and 3) conversion of the problem into linear matrix inequalities, which can be solved through convex optimization. For steps 2) and 3) we present solutions that are suitable for full automation.
Henning Burchardt, Jens Oehlerking, Oliver E. Theel
PRDC2