Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Todd Lupton

dblp:87/3663 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.112012
Visual-Inertial-Aided Navigation for High-Dynamic Motion in Built Environments Without Initial Conditions · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › multi-sensor SLAM
visual-inertial SLAM
0.112012
Visual-Inertial-Aided Navigation for High-Dynamic Motion in Built Environments Without Initial Conditions · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.122012
Removing scale biases and ambiguity from 6DoF monocular SLAM using inertial · ICRA 2008
Visual-Inertial-Aided Navigation for High-Dynamic Motion in Built Environments Without Initial Conditions · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
visual-inertial fusion
0.112008
Removing scale biases and ambiguity from 6DoF monocular SLAM using inertial · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
visual SLAM
0.112008
Removing scale biases and ambiguity from 6DoF monocular SLAM using inertial · ICRA 2008
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › visual SLAM
monocular SLAM
0.112007
Inertial Aiding of Inverse Depth SLAM using a Monocular Camera · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.112007
Inertial Aiding of Inverse Depth SLAM using a Monocular Camera · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observability analysis · 0.1inertial integration · 0.1graphical SLAM · 0.1square root information filter · 0.1IMU integration · 0.1inverse depth parameterization · 0.1inertial measurement unit · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Visual-Inertial-Aided Navigation for High-Dynamic Motion in Built Environments Without Initial Conditions
abstract
In this paper, we present a novel method to fuse observations from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and visual sensors, such that initial conditions of the inertial integration, including gravity estimation, can be recovered quickly and in a linear manner, thus removing any need for special initialization procedures. The algorithm is implemented using a graphical simultaneous localization and mapping like approach that guarantees constant time output. This paper discusses the technical aspects of the work, including observability and the ability for the system to estimate scale in real time. Results are presented of the system, estimating the platforms position, velocity, and attitude, as well as gravity vector and sensor alignment and calibration on-line in a built environment. This paper discusses the system setup, describing the real-time integration of the IMU data with either stereo or monocular vision data. We focus on human motion for the purposes of emulating high-dynamic motion, as well as to provide a localization system for future human-robot interaction.
Todd Lupton, Salah Sukkarieh
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2009 Efficient integration of inertial observations into visual SLAM without initialization
abstract
The use of accelerometer and gyro observations in a visual SLAM implementation is beneficial especially in high dynamic situations. The downside of using inertial is that traditionally high prediction rates are required as observations are provided at high sample rates. An accurate orientation and velocity estimate must also be maintained at all times in order to integrate the inertial observations and correct for the effect of gravity. This paper presents a way to pre-integrate the high rate inertial observations without the need for an initial orientation or velocity estimate. This allows for a slower filter prediction rate and use of inertial observations when the initial velocity and attitude of the platform are unknown. Additionally the initial velocity and roll and pitch of the platform become observable over time and an estimate of these values is provided by the filter. An estimate of the gravity vector is also provided. Results are presented using a delayed state information smoother implementation however due to the linearity of the equations this technique can be applied to extended Kalman filter (EKF) implementations just as easily.
Todd Lupton, Salah Sukkarieh
IROS1
2008 Removing scale biases and ambiguity from 6DoF monocular SLAM using inertial
abstract
This paper identifies various scale factor biases commonly introduced into monocular SLAM implementations as a result of the true scale factor of the map not being observable. A way to make the scale factor observable and remove any scale biases via the use of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) is presented and implemented. Results show that with an IMU the true scale of the map becomes observable over time and the use of a square root information filter allows the effect of initial scale biases to be removed completely from the solution resulting in an unbiased solution no matter what the initial scale assumptions are.
Todd Lupton, Salah Sukkarieh
ICRA1
2007 Inertial Aiding of Inverse Depth SLAM using a Monocular Camera
abstract
This paper presents the benefits of using a low cost inertial measurement unit to aid in an implementation of inverse depth initialized SLAM using a hand-held monocular camera. Results are presented with and without inertial observations for different assumed initial ranges to features on the same dataset. When using only the camera, the scale of the scene is not observable. As expected, the scale of the map depends on the prior used to initialize the depth of the features and may drift when exploring new terrain, precluding loop closure. The results show that the inertial observations help to improve the estimated trajectory of the camera leading to a better estimation of the map scale and a more accurate localization of features.
Pedro Pinies, Todd Lupton, Salah Sukkarieh, Juan D. Tardós
ICRA2