Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Butler

dblp:87/3735 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › middleware › distributed object middleware
CORBA
0.011999
A Performance Broker for CORBA · HPDC 1999
Distributed systems
middleware
0.011999
A Performance Broker for CORBA · HPDC 1999
Distributed systems › service-oriented architecture
service selection
0.011999
A Performance Broker for CORBA · HPDC 1999
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource allocation
0.011999
A Performance Broker for CORBA · HPDC 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted criteria · 0.0performance test suites · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Spatially thinned bootstrap and random toroidal shift methods for correct estimation of P-values of maps similarity
abstract
In the context of comparing two categorical maps, addressing the challenges posed by the dependence on marginal frequencies and spatial configuration is a formidable task. Map comparison typically relies on a numerical similarity index S, such as the spatial fuzzy kappa index, which has a probability distribution that varies according to the marginal frequencies of the classes and their spatial configuration in the maps. This variability makes it difficult to mathematically derive and assess the uncertainty associated with any empirical index. In this paper, we introduce two novel methods: the spatially thinned bootstrap and the random toroidal shift. These methods provide a robust framework for comparing two maps using an arbitrary similarity index while accounting for these marginal noise factors. Our approach is characterized by its generality and abstraction, enabling application across different indices of map similarity. To illustrate the effectiveness of our methods, we conduct an extensive study employing the spatial fuzzy kappa index, revealing valuable insights into the behavior and underlying distribution of similarity indices.
Renato Assunção, Kevin Butler, Eric Krause, Mark V. Janikas, Ting-Hwan Lee, Hanna Asefaw
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.2
2022 DR-VIDAL - Doubly Robust Variational Information-theoretic Deep Adversarial Learning for Counterfactual Prediction and Treatment Effect Estimation
Shantanu Ghosh, Zheng Feng, Jiang Bian 0001, Kevin Butler, Mattia Prosperi
AMIA4
1999 A Performance Broker for CORBA
abstract
CORBA applications can transparently use service instances running on the client's machine, on the local-area network, or across the Internet. Standard CORBA services help the application locate service instances, but do not provide a mechanism to identify service instances that will give good performance. The PerformanceBroker executes performance test suites on application service instances and selects service instances that will give superior application performance. The Broker weights performance test results according to client-specified criteria to choose the service instances that will provide the best application performance and allocates those service instances to clients. Tests with a distributed ray tracing application show that service instances chosen by the PerformanceBroker give better performance than service instances chosen by round-robin or random selection in local-area network and Internet environments.
Kevin Butler, Mark J. Clement, Quinn Snell
HPDC1