Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nechama Allenberg-Navony

dblp:87/4196 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
average-case complexity
0.011996
Average and Randomized Complexity of Distributed Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms
deterministic distributed algorithms
0.011996
Average and Randomized Complexity of Distributed Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.011996
Average and Randomized Complexity of Distributed Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Distributed computing theory › distributed algorithms
randomized distributed algorithms
0.011996
Average and Randomized Complexity of Distributed Problems · SIAM J. Comput. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

yao's method · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Average and Randomized Complexity of Distributed Problems
abstract
Yao proved that in the decision-tree model, the average complexity of the best deterministic algorithm is a lower bound on the complexity of randomized algorithms that solve the same problem. Here it is shown that a similar result does not always hold in the common model of distributed computation, the model in which all the processors run the same program (which may depend on the processors’ input). We therefore construct a new technique that together with Yao’s method enables us to show that in many cases, a similar relationship does hold in the distributed model. This relationship enables us to carry over known lower bounds on the complexity of deterministic computations to the realm of randomized computations, thus obtaining new results. The new technique can also be used for obtaining results concerning algorithms with bounded error.
Nechama Allenberg-Navony, Alon Itai, Shlomo Moran
SIAM J. Comput.1