Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parag Agrawal
dblp:87/4845
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 10 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 68% Reinforcement learning · 16% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Data mining · 29% Data integration and cleaning · 25% Information retrieval · 17% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 61% Cloud and datacenter computing · 39% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
pretraining data curation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Safer Pretraining: Analyzing and Filtering Harmful Content in Webscale Datasets for Responsible LLMs · IJCAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering
prompt optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SCULPT: Systematic Tuning of Long Prompts · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment · ICML 2025 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Interpretable and Informative Explanations of Outcomes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014 |
Database theory › query answering
certain answers |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Foundations of Uncertain-Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010 |
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
inconsistency detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Foundations of Uncertain-Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010 |
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On indexing error-tolerant set containment · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Data integration and cleaning › entity resolution
record matching |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On indexing error-tolerant set containment · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
set similarity search |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On indexing error-tolerant set containment · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Data integration and cleaning
uncertain data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Foundations of Uncertain-Data Integration · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010 |
Query processing and optimization
probabilistic query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Confidence-Aware Join Algorithms · ICDE 2009 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter workloads
batch processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Scheduling shared scans of large data files · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Storage systems › i/o scheduling › disk scheduling
SCAN scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Scheduling shared scans of large data files · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › consistency
consistency models |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Asynchronous view maintenance for VLSD databases · SIGMOD Conference 2009 |
Query processing and optimization
materialized view |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Asynchronous view maintenance for VLSD databases · SIGMOD Conference 2009 |
Query processing and optimization › query execution
memory-constrained query processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Confidence-Aware Join Algorithms · ICDE 2009 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling › cluster scheduling
mapreduce scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Scheduling shared scans of large data files · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer-based harmful content classifier · 0.9reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.9prompt evaluation · 0.9evolutionary search · 0.9black-box optimization · 0.9sampling · 0.2heuristics · 0.2string transformation · 0.1inverted list · 0.1top-k algorithm · 0.1threshold algorithm · 0.1simulation · 0.1scheduling policy design · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SCULPT: Systematic Tuning of Long PromptsabstractShanu Kumar, Akhila Yesantarao Venkata, Shubhanshu Khandelwal, Bishal Santra, Parag Agrawal, Manish Gupta. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Shanu Kumar, Akhila Yesantarao Venkata, Shubhanshu Khandelwal, Bishal Santra, Parag Agrawal, Manish Gupta 0001 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | Enhancing Zero-shot Chain of Thought Prompting via Uncertainty-Guided Strategy SelectionabstractChain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has significantly enhanced the the capability of large language models (LLMs) by structuring their reasoning processes. However, existing methods face critical limitations: handcrafted demonstrations require extensive human expertise, while trigger phrases are prone to inaccuracies. In this paper, we propose the Zero-shot Uncertainty-based Selection (ZEUS) method, a novel approach that improves CoT prompting by utilizing uncertainty estimates to select effective demonstrations without needing access to model parameters. Unlike traditional methods, ZEUS offers high sensitivity in distinguishing between helpful and ineffective questions, ensuring more precise and reliable selection. Our extensive evaluation shows that ZEUS consistently outperforms existing CoT strategies across four challenging reasoning benchmarks, demonstrating its robustness and scalability. Shanu Kumar, Saish Mendke, Karody Lubna Abdul Rahman, Santosh Kurasa, Parag Agrawal, Sandipan Dandapat |
COLING | 5 |
| 2025 | AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM AlignmentabstractReinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an $\alpha$-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and over-optimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance. Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, Jiwoo Hong, Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Parag Agrawal, Natesh S. Pillai, S. Sathiya Keerthi |
ICML | 11 |
| 2025 | Towards Safer Pretraining: Analyzing and Filtering Harmful Content in Webscale Datasets for Responsible LLMsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have become integral to various real-world applications, leveraging massive, web-sourced datasets like Common Crawl, C4, and FineWeb for pretraining. While these datasets provide linguistic data essential for high-quality natural language generation, they often contain harmful content, such as hate speech, misinformation, and biased narratives. Training LLMs on such unfiltered data risks perpetuating toxic behaviors, spreading misinformation, and amplifying societal biases which can undermine trust in LLM-driven applications and raise ethical concerns about their use. This paper presents a large-scale analysis of inappropriate content across these datasets, offering a comprehensive taxonomy that categorizes harmful webpages into Topical and Toxic based on their intent. We also introduce a prompt evaluation dataset, a high-accuracy Topical and Toxic Prompt (TTP), and a transformer-based model (HarmFormer) for harmful content filtering. Additionally, we create a new multi-harm open-ended toxicity benchmark (HAVOC) and provide crucial insights into how models respond to adversarial toxic inputs. Our work offers insights into ensuring safer LLM pretraining and serves as a resource for Responsible AI (RAI) compliance. Disclaimer: This paper includes potentially offensive content due to the nature of the research. Sai Krishna Mendu, Harish Yenala, Aditi Gulati, Shanu Kumar, Parag Agrawal |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Navigating the Cultural Kaleidoscope: A Hitchhiker's Guide to Sensitivity in Large Language ModelsabstractSomnath Banerjee, Sayan Layek, Hari Shrawgi, Rajarshi Mandal, Avik Halder, Shanu Kumar, Sagnik Basu, Parag Agrawal, Rima Hazra, Animesh Mukherjee. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Somnath Banerjee 0002, Sayan Layek, Hari Shrawgi, Rajarshi Mandal, Avik Halder, Shanu Kumar, Sagnik Basu, Parag Agrawal, Rima Hazra, Animesh Mukherjee 0001 |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 8 |
| 2023 | Theory meets practice approach for Event CorrelationsabstractEvent correlation provides a powerful lever to analyze the events data to better manage the enterprise IT systems. While many event correlation algorithms are present in literature, applying them in practice presents many real-world challenges. In this paper, we present our experience with the challenges, the workarounds, and the opportunities in using event correlations in enterprise IT systems. We propose a domain-aware way to select the right scope of events for correlation, with self-tuning parameters and recommending right correlation signatures based on the use-case. We present the effectiveness of our ideas with a real-world case-study. Sai Charan Emmadi, Parag Agrawal, Satya Samudrala, Vikrant Shimpi, Maitreya Natu |
IEEE Big Data | 2 |
| 2023 | Optimizing for Member Value in an Edge Building MarketplaceabstractSocial networks are prosperous marketplaces where creators and consumers congregate to share and consume various content. In general, products that rank content for distribution (such as newsfeeds, stories, and notifications) and are related to edge recommendations (such as connect to members, follow celebrities or groups or hashtags) optimize the experience of active users. Typically, such users generate ample interaction data amenable to accurate model training and prediction. In contrast, we prioritize enhancing the experience of inactive members (IMs) who do not have a rich connection network. We formulate strategies for recommending superior edges to help members grow their connection network. Adapting the recommendations provides enormous value to the IMs and can significantly influence their future behaviour and engagement with the ecosystem. To that end, we propose a general and scalable multi-objective optimization (MOO) framework to provide more value to IMs as invitation recipients on LinkedIn, a professional network with over 900M members. To deal with the enormous scale, we formulate the problem as a massive constrained linear optimization involving billions of variables and millions of constraints and efficiently solve it using accelerated gradient descent,making this the largest deployment of LP-based recommender systems worldwide. Furthermore, the proposed MOO paradigm can solve the general problem of matching different types of entities in an m-sided marketplace. Finally, we discuss the challenges and benefits of implementing and ramping our method in production at scale at LinkedIn and report our findings about the core business metrics related to users' engagement and network health. Ayan Acharya, Ankan Saha, Borja Ocejo Elizondo, Kinjal Basu 0001, S. Sathiya Keerthi, Rahul Mazumder, Parag Agrawal |
CIKM | 9 |
| 2019 | Mining Strengths and Weaknesses of Cricket Players Using Short Text CommentaryabstractKnowledge of strengths and weaknesses of players is the key for team selection and strategy planning in any team sport such as Cricket. Computationally, this problem is mostly unexplored. Existing methods focus only on aggregate and macroscopic statistics that ignore many details. The central idea of our paper is to mine strength and weakness rules using short text commentary data. This dataset is compact, semi-structured, accurate, and yet ignored by the machine learning community until now. We collect fine-grained information about each player from the short text commentary dataset and represent it using domain-specific features identified by us. We employ a dimensionality reduction method specific to discrete random variable case, namely correspondence analysis and construct semantic relation between bowler and batsman. This relation is plotted using biplots. Human readable strength and weakness rules are extracted from the biplots. We have performed experiments using a large dataset that describes over one million deliveries. We validate our extracted rules using both intrinsic and extrinsic validation. Swarup Ranjan Behera, Parag Agrawal, Amit Awekar, Vijaya Saradhi Vedula |
ICMLA | 2 |
| 2014 | Interpretable and Informative Explanations of OutcomesabstractIn this paper, we solve the following data summarization problem: given a multi-dimensional data set augmented with a binary attribute, how can we construct an interpretable and informative summary of the factors affecting the binary attribute in terms of the combinations of values of the dimension attributes? We refer to such summaries as explanation tables. We show the hardness of constructing optimally-informative explanation tables from data, and we propose effective and efficient heuristics. The proposed heuristics are based on sampling and include optimizations related to computing the information content of a summary from a sample of the data. Using real data sets, we demonstrate the advantages of explanation tables compared to related approaches that can be adapted to solve our problem, and we show significant performance benefits of our optimizations. Kareem El Gebaly, Parag Agrawal, Lukasz Golab, Flip Korn, Divesh Srivastava |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2010 | On indexing error-tolerant set containmentabstractPrior work has identified set based comparisons as a useful primitive for supporting a wide variety of similarity functions in record matching. Accordingly, various techniques have been proposed to improve the performance of set similarity lookups. However, this body of work focuses almost exclusively on symmetric notions of set similarity. In this paper, we study the indexing problem for the asymmetric Jaccard containment similarity function that is an error-tolerant variation of set containment. We enhance this similarity function to also account for string transformations that reflect synonyms such as "Bob" and "Robert" referring to the same first name. We propose an index structure that builds inverted lists on carefully chosen token-sets and a lookup algorithm using our index that is sensitive to the output size of the query. Our experiments over real life data sets show the benefits of our techniques. To our knowledge, this is the first paper that studies the indexing problem for Jaccard containment in the presence of string transformations. Parag Agrawal, Arvind Arasu, Raghav Kaushik |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 2010 | Foundations of Uncertain-Data IntegrationabstractThere has been considerable past work studying data integration and uncertain data in isolation. We develop the foundations for local-as-view (LAV) data integration when the sources being integrated are uncertain. We motivate two distinct settings for uncertain-data integration. We then define containment of uncertain databases in these settings, which allows us to express uncertain sources as views over a virtual mediated uncertain database. Next, we define consistency of a set of uncertain sources and show intractability of consistency-checking. We identify an interesting special case for which consistency-checking is polynomial. Finally, the notion of certain answers from traditional LAV data integration does not generalize to the uncertain setting, so we define a corresponding notion of correct answers . Parag Agrawal, Anish Das Sarma, Jeffrey D. Ullman, Jennifer Widom |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2009 | Confidence-Aware Join AlgorithmsabstractIn uncertain and probabilistic databases,confidencevalues (orprobabilities) are associated with each data item. Confidence values are assigned to query results based on combining confidences from the input data. Users may wish to apply a threshold on result confidence values, ask for the "top-k" results by confidence, or obtain results sorted by confidence. Efficient algorithms for these types of queries can be devised by exploiting properties of the input data and the combining functions for result confidences. Previous algorithms for these problems assumed sufficient memory was available for processing. In this paper, we address the problem of processing all three types of queries when sufficient memory is not available, minimizing retrieval cost. We present algorithms, theoretical guarantees, and experimental evaluation. Parag Agrawal, Jennifer Widom |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2009 | Asynchronous view maintenance for VLSD databasesabstractThe query models of the recent generation of very large scale distributed (VLSD) shared-nothing data storage systems, including our own PNUTS and others (e.g. BigTable, Dynamo, Cassandra, etc.) are intentionally simple, focusing on simple lookups and scans and trading query expressiveness for massive scale. Indexes and views can expand the query expressiveness of such systems by materializing more complex access paths and query results. In this paper, we examine mechanisms to implement indexes and views in a massive scale distributed database. For web applications, minimizing update latencies is critical, so we advocate deferring the work of maintaining views and indexes as much as possible. We examine the design space, and conclude that two types of view implementations, called remote view tables (RVTs) and local view tables (LVTs), provide good tradeoff between system throughput and minimizing view staleness. We describe how to construct and maintain such view tables, and how they can be used to implement indexes, group-by-aggregate views, equijoin views and selection views. We also introduce and analyze a consistency model that makes it easier for application developers to cope with the impact of deferred view maintenance. An empirical evaluation quantifies the maintenance costs of our views, and shows that they can significantly improve the cost of evaluating complex queries. Parag Agrawal, Adam Silberstein, Brian F. Cooper, Utkarsh Srivastava, Raghu Ramakrishnan 0001 |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |
| 2008 | Scheduling shared scans of large data filesabstractWe study how best to schedule scans of large data files, in the presence of many simultaneous requests to a common set of files. The objective is to maximize the overall rate of processing these files, by sharing scans of the same file as aggressively as possible, without imposing undue wait time on individual jobs. This scheduling problem arises in batch data processing environments such as Map-Reduce systems, some of which handle tens of thousands of processing requests daily, over a shared set of files. As we demonstrate, conventional scheduling techniques such as shortest-job-first do not perform well in the presence of cross-job sharing opportunities. We derive a new family of scheduling policies specifically targeted to sharable workloads. Our scheduling policies revolve around the notion that, all else being equal, it is good to schedule nonsharable scans ahead of ones that can share IO work with future jobs, if the arrival rate of sharable future jobs is expected to be high. We evaluate our policies via simulation over varied synthetic and real workloads, and demonstrate significant performance gains compared with conventional scheduling approaches. Parag Agrawal, Daniel Kifer, Christopher Olston |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2007 | Trio-One: Layering Uncertainty and Lineage on a Conventional DBMS (Demo)
Michi Mutsuzaki, Martin Theobald, Ander de Keijzer, Jennifer Widom, Parag Agrawal, Omar Benjelloun, Anish Das Sarma, Raghotham Murthy, Tomoe Sugihara |
CIDR | 5 |
| 2006 | Trio: A System for Data, Uncertainty, and Lineage
Parag Agrawal, Omar Benjelloun, Anish Das Sarma, Chris Hayworth, Shubha U. Nabar, Tomoe Sugihara, Jennifer Widom |
VLDB | 1 |