International audience

Honeypots, a form of active cyber defence, assist in frustrating cyber aggressors through a detect and deceive strategy. However, significant legal questions arise in the USA from the emulation of a production host for purposes of recording information pertaining to access sessions. Taking a holistic perspective, this research explores credible legal claims that may arise when using a honeypot. Situations consider issues pertaining to setting up a honeypot to not violate US federal and state privacy laws, to operating a honeypot without becoming exposed to first or third party liability, and to providing data gathered by a honeypot to law enforcement officials to contribute to an investigation.

This paper presents the results of experiments to measure subjective G.711 audio quality resulting from wireless transmission over encrypted IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, and IEEE 802.11n draft 2.0 wireless local area networks (WLANs). Following ITU-T Recommendation P. 800, forty-two human subjects rate audio recordings taken during 12 network conditions. WLAN encryption is alternated between WPA2 and WPA2 with transport mode 3DES IPsec, and simultaneous call volume is alternated between 6 or 10 simultaneous calls. Results indicate that a previous E-model calculation for 802.11b accurately predicts the subjective Mean Opinion Score (MOS). The upper bound for the decline in MOS due to 3DES IPsec is found to be less than 0.65 (90% CI) for all scenarios examined. Additionally, the subjective data suggest that the combination of G.711 encoding and 802.11 transmission makes toll quality (MOS > 4.0) calls over an encrypted 802.11 WLAN impractical.