Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

dblp:87/6660 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9291-0954ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
prompt-based segmentation
0.912025
LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › open-world segmentation
zero-shot segmentation
0.912025
LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation
lesion segmentation
0.912025
LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.912025
LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation › lesion segmentation
tumor segmentation
0.912025
LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 1.7promptable segmentation · 1.74d tracking · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LesionLocator: Zero-Shot Universal Tumor Segmentation and Tracking in 3D Whole-Body Imaging
abstract
In this work, we present LesionLocator, a framework for zero-shot longitudinal lesion tracking and segmentation in 3D medical imaging, establishing the first end-to-end model capable of 4D tracking with dense spatial prompts. Our model leverages an extensive dataset of 23,262 annotated medical scans, as well as synthesized longitudinal data across diverse lesion types. The diversity and scale of our dataset significantly enhances model generalizability to real-world medical imaging challenges and addresses key limitations in longitudinal data availability. LesionLocator outperforms all existing promptable models in lesion segmentation by nearly 10 dice points, reaching human-level performance, and achieves state-of-the-art results in lesion tracking, with superior lesion retrieval and segmentation accuracy. LesionLocator not only sets a new benchmark in universal promptable lesion segmentation and automated longitudinal lesion tracking but also provides the first open-access solution of its kind, releasing our synthetic 4D dataset and model to the community, empowering future advancements in medical imaging. Code is available at: www.github.com/MIC-DKFZ/LesionLocator
Maximilian Rokuss, Yannick Kirchhoff, Seval Akbal, Balint Kovacs, Saikat Roy, Constantin Ulrich, Tassilo Wald, Lukas T. Rotkopf, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Klaus H. Maier-Hein
CVPR9
2023 Anatomy-Informed Data Augmentation for Enhanced Prostate Cancer Detection
Balint Kovacs, Nils Netzer, Michael Baumgartner 0001, Carolin Eith, Dimitrios Bounias, Clara Meinzer, Paul F. Jaeger, Kevin S. Zhang, Ralf Floca, Adrian Schrader, Fabian Isensee, Regula Gnirs, Magdalena Görtz, Viktoria Schütz, Albrecht Stenzinger, Markus Hohenfellner, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Ivo Wolf, David Bonekamp, Klaus H. Maier-Hein
MICCAI (7)17
2020 Self-guided Multiple Instance Learning for Weakly Supervised Disease Classification and Localization in Chest Radiographs
Constantin Seibold, Jens Kleesiek, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Rainer Stiefelhagen
ACCV (5)3
2017 Revealing Hidden Potentials of the q-Space Signal in Breast Cancer
Paul F. Jaeger, Sebastian Bickelhaupt, Frederik B. Laun, Wolfgang Lederer, Heidi Daniel, Tristan Anselm Kuder, Daniel Paech, David Bonekamp, Alexander Radbruch, Stefan Delorme, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Franziska Steudle, Klaus H. Maier-Hein
MICCAI (1)11
2014 Pose-independent surface matching for intra-operative soft-tissue marker-less registration
Thiago R. dos Santos, Alexander Seitel, Thomas Kilgus, Stefan Suwelack, Anna-Laura Wekerle, Hannes Kenngott, Stefanie Speidel, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Tobias Heimann, Lena Maier-Hein
Medical Image Anal.8
2014 Comparative Validation of Single-Shot Optical Techniques for Laparoscopic 3-D Surface Reconstruction
abstract
Intra-operative imaging techniques for obtaining the shape and morphology of soft-tissue surfaces in vivo are a key enabling technology for advanced surgical systems. Different optical techniques for 3-D surface reconstruction in laparoscopy have been proposed, however, so far no quantitative and comparative validation has been performed. Furthermore, robustness of the methods to clinically important factors like smoke or bleeding has not yet been assessed. To address these issues, we have formed a joint international initiative with the aim of validating different state-of-the-art passive and active reconstruction methods in a comparative manner. In this comprehensive in vitro study, we investigated reconstruction accuracy using different organs with various shape and texture and also tested reconstruction robustness with respect to a number of factors like the pose of the endoscope as well as the amount of blood or smoke present in the scene. The study suggests complementary advantages of the different techniques with respect to accuracy, robustness, point density, hardware complexity and computation time. While reconstruction accuracy under ideal conditions was generally high, robustness is a remaining issue to be addressed. Future work should include sensor fusion and in vivo validation studies in a specific clinical context. To trigger further research in surface reconstruction, stereoscopic data of the study will be made publically available at www.open-CAS.com upon publication of the paper.
Lena Maier-Hein, Anja Groch, Adrien Bartoli, Sebastian Bodenstedt, G. Boissonnat, Ping-Lin Chang, Neil Clancy, Daniel S. Elson, Sven Haase, Eric Heim, Joachim Hornegger, Pierre Jannin, Hannes Kenngott, Thomas Kilgus, Beat P. Müller-Stich, D. Oladokun, Sebastian Röhl, Thiago R. dos Santos, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Alexander Seitel, Stefanie Speidel, Martin Wagner 0001, Danail Stoyanov
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging19