Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathalie A. Johnson

dblp:87/7070 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.112009
Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number alteration analysis
0.112009
Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
model-based clustering
0.112009
Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data analysis
array CGH analysis
0.012009
Model-based clustering of array CGH data · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hidden markov model · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Model-based clustering of array CGH data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data for recurrent DNA copy number alterations from a cohort of patients can yield distinct sets of molecular signatures or profiles. This can be due to the presence of heterogeneous cancer subtypes within a supposedly homogeneous population. RESULTS: We propose a novel statistical method for automatically detecting such subtypes or clusters. Our approach is model based: each cluster is defined in terms of a sparse profile, which contains the locations of unusually frequent alterations. The profile is represented as a hidden Markov model. Samples are assigned to clusters based on their similarity to the cluster's profile. We simultaneously infer the cluster assignments and the cluster profiles using an expectation maximization-like algorithm. We show, using a realistic simulation study, that our method is significantly more accurate than standard clustering techniques. We then apply our method to two clinical datasets. In particular, we examine previously reported aCGH data from a cohort of 106 follicular lymphoma patients, and discover clusters that are known to correspond to clinically relevant subgroups. In addition, we examine a cohort of 92 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, and discover previously unreported clusters of biological interest which have inspired followup clinical research on an independent cohort. AVAILABILITY: Software and synthetic datasets are available at http://www.cs.ubc.ca/ approximately sshah/acgh as part of the CNA-HMMer package. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Sohrab P. Shah, K-John Cheung Jr., Nathalie A. Johnson, Guillaume Alain, Randy D. Gascoyne, Douglas E. Horsman, Raymond T. Ng, Kevin Murphy 0002
Bioinform.3