Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erik van der Sluis

dblp:87/806 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 62% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives
physical unclonable function
0.422015
Secure Key Generation from Biased PUFs · CHES 2015
Soft Decision Error Correction for Compact Memory-Based PUFs Using a Single Enrollment · CHES 2012
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
key generation
0.322015
Secure Key Generation from Biased PUFs · CHES 2015
Soft Decision Error Correction for Compact Memory-Based PUFs Using a Single Enrollment · CHES 2012
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives › physical unclonable function
error correction
0.112012
Soft Decision Error Correction for Compact Memory-Based PUFs Using a Single Enrollment · CHES 2012
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › key generation
PUF-based key generation
0.012012
Soft Decision Error Correction for Compact Memory-Based PUFs Using a Single Enrollment · CHES 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

key generation · 0.2PUF · 0.2soft decision error correction · 0.1single enrollment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 A Robust SRAM-PUF Key Generation Scheme Based on Polar Codes
abstract
Physical unclonable functions (PUFs) are relatively new security primitives used for device authentication and device-specific secret key generation. In this paper we focus on SRAM- PUFs. The SRAM-PUFs enjoy uniqueness and randomness properties stemming from the intrinsic randomness of SRAM memory cells, which is a result of manufacturing variations. This randomness can be translated into the cryptographic keys thus avoiding the need to store and manage the device cryptographic keys. Therefore these properties, combined with the fact that SRAM memory can be often found in today's IoT devices, make SRAM-PUFs a promising candidate for securing and authentication of the resource-constrained IoT devices. PUF observations are always affected by noise and environmental changes. Therefore secret- generation schemes with helper data are used to guarantee reliable regeneration of the PUF-based secret keys. Error correction codes (ECCs) are an essential part of these schemes. In this work, we propose a practical error correction construction for PUF-based secret generation that are based on polar codes. The resulting scheme can generate 128-bit keys using 1024 SRAM-PUF bits and 896 helper data bits and achieve a failure probability of 10^{-9} or lower for a practical SRAM-PUFs setting with bit error probability of 15%. The method is based on successive cancellation combined with list decoding and hash-based checking that makes use of the hash that is already available at the decoder. In addition, an adaptive list decoder for polar codes is investigated. This decoder increases the list size only if needed.
Bin Chen 0006, Tanya Ignatenko, Frans M. J. Willems, Roel Maes, Erik van der Sluis, Georgios N. Selimis
GLOBECOM5
2017 Security of helper data schemes for SRAM-PUF in multiple enrollment scenarios
abstract
Fuzzy commitment and syndrome-based schemes are two well-known helper data schemes used to bind and generate, respectively, a secret key to/from SRAM-PUF observations. To allow the decoder to reconstruct this secret key from a new (verification) observation of an SRAM-PUF, an encoder has to generate so-called helper data. This helper data is a function of an SRAM-PUF enrollment observation and, in case of fuzzy commitment, the secret key. The helper data is assumed to be public and thus must leak no information about the secret key. It is known that both schemes can achieve secrecy capacity equal to the mutual information between enrollment and verification SRAM-PUF observations at zero secrecy leakage, when the observations are unbiased and a single enrollment is performed. We study here the situation when multiple SRAM-PUF observations are used to create multiple secret keys. First, we introduce a symmetry property for multiple SRAM-PUF observations. For such symmetric SRAM-PUFs, we show that, in both helper data schemes, the helper data corresponding to multiple SRAM-PUF observations provide no information about any of the secret keys.
Lieneke Kusters, Tanya Ignatenko, Frans M. J. Willems, Roel Maes, Erik van der Sluis, Georgios N. Selimis
ISIT5
2015 Secure Key Generation from Biased PUFs
Roel Maes, Vincent van der Leest, Erik van der Sluis, Frans M. J. Willems
CHES3
2012 Soft Decision Error Correction for Compact Memory-Based PUFs Using a Single Enrollment
Vincent van der Leest, Bart Preneel, Erik van der Sluis
CHES3
2009 Call packing bound for overflow loss systems
Nico M. van Dijk, Erik van der Sluis
Perform. Evaluation2