Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua L. Moore

dblp:87/9529 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2233-2527ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 84% Information extraction and text analysis · 16%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 59% Machine learning and data management · 26% Data mining · 15%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video representation learning
self-supervised video representation learning
0.612022
GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning · ECCV (31) 2022
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video representation learning
0.612022
GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning · ECCV (31) 2022
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112012
Playlist prediction via metric embedding · KDD 2012
Recommender systems › music recommendation
playlist generation
0.112012
Playlist prediction via metric embedding · KDD 2012
Machine learning and data management
scalable machine learning
0.112011
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
hashing
0.112011
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
minwise hashing
0.112011
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling
0.012013
Animacy Detection with Voting Models · EMNLP 2013
Data mining › similarity computation
set similarity
0.012011
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011
Data mining
similarity computation
0.012011
Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

clustering · 0.6logistic regression · 0.2linear SVM · 0.2b-bit minwise hashing · 0.2voting · 0.2ensemble classifier · 0.2maximum-likelihood embedding · 0.1matrix factorization · 0.1latent markov embedding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning
Huseyin Coskun, Alireza Zareian, Joshua L. Moore, Federico Tombari
ECCV (31)3
2013 Animacy Detection with Voting Models
abstract
Animacy detection is a problem whose solution has been shown to be beneficial for a number of syntactic and semantic tasks.We present a state-of-the-art system for this task which uses a number of simple classifiers with heterogeneous data sources in a voting scheme.We show how this framework can give us direct insight into the behavior of the system, allowing us to more easily diagnose sources of error.
Joshua L. Moore, Christopher J. C. Burges, Erin Renshaw, Scott Yih
EMNLP1
2012 Playlist prediction via metric embedding
abstract
Digital storage of personal music collections and cloud-based music services (e.g. Pandora, Spotify) have fundamentally changed how music is consumed. In particular, automatically generated playlists have become an important mode of accessing large music collections. The key goal of automated playlist generation is to provide the user with a coherent listening experience. In this paper, we present Latent Markov Embedding (LME), a machine learning algorithm for generating such playlists. In analogy to matrix factorization methods for collaborative filtering, the algorithm does not require songs to be described by features a priori, but it learns a representation from example playlists. We formulate this problem as a regularized maximum-likelihood embedding of Markov chains in Euclidian space, and show how the resulting optimization problem can be solved efficiently. An empirical evaluation shows that the LME is substantially more accurate than adaptations of smoothed n-gram models commonly used in natural language processing.
Shuo Chen 0008, Joshua L. Moore, Douglas R. Turnbull, Thorsten Joachims
KDD2
2011 Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning
abstract
Minwise hashing is a standard technique in the context of search for efficiently computing set similarities. The recent development of b-bit minwise hashing provides a substantial improvement by storing only the lowest b bits of each hashed value. In this paper, we demonstrate that b-bit minwise hashing can be naturally integrated with linear learning algorithms such as linear SVM and logistic regression, to solve large-scale and high-dimensional statistical learning tasks, especially when the data do not fit in memory. We compare $b$-bit minwise hashing with the Count-Min (CM) and Vowpal Wabbit (VW) algorithms, which have essentially the same variances as random projections. Our theoretical and empirical comparisons illustrate that b-bit minwise hashing is significantly more accurate (at the same storage cost) than VW (and random projections) for binary data.
Ping Li 0001, Anshumali Shrivastava, Joshua L. Moore, Arnd Christian König
NIPS3