Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joshua L. Moore
dblp:87/9529
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2233-2527ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 84% Information extraction and text analysis · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 59% Machine learning and data management · 26% Data mining · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video representation learning
self-supervised video representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning · ECCV (31) 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning · ECCV (31) 2022 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Playlist prediction via metric embedding · KDD 2012 |
Recommender systems › music recommendation
playlist generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Playlist prediction via metric embedding · KDD 2012 |
Machine learning and data management
scalable machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
hashing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
minwise hashing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Animacy Detection with Voting Models · EMNLP 2013 |
Data mining › similarity computation
set similarity |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Data mining
similarity computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale Learning · NIPS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
clustering · 0.6logistic regression · 0.2linear SVM · 0.2b-bit minwise hashing · 0.2voting · 0.2ensemble classifier · 0.2maximum-likelihood embedding · 0.1matrix factorization · 0.1latent markov embedding · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | GOCA: Guided Online Cluster Assignment for Self-supervised Video Representation Learning
Huseyin Coskun, Alireza Zareian, Joshua L. Moore, Federico Tombari |
ECCV (31) | 3 |
| 2013 | Animacy Detection with Voting ModelsabstractAnimacy detection is a problem whose solution has been shown to be beneficial for a number of syntactic and semantic tasks.We present a state-of-the-art system for this task which uses a number of simple classifiers with heterogeneous data sources in a voting scheme.We show how this framework can give us direct insight into the behavior of the system, allowing us to more easily diagnose sources of error. Joshua L. Moore, Christopher J. C. Burges, Erin Renshaw, Scott Yih |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2012 | Playlist prediction via metric embeddingabstractDigital storage of personal music collections and cloud-based music services (e.g. Pandora, Spotify) have fundamentally changed how music is consumed. In particular, automatically generated playlists have become an important mode of accessing large music collections. The key goal of automated playlist generation is to provide the user with a coherent listening experience. In this paper, we present Latent Markov Embedding (LME), a machine learning algorithm for generating such playlists. In analogy to matrix factorization methods for collaborative filtering, the algorithm does not require songs to be described by features a priori, but it learns a representation from example playlists. We formulate this problem as a regularized maximum-likelihood embedding of Markov chains in Euclidian space, and show how the resulting optimization problem can be solved efficiently. An empirical evaluation shows that the LME is substantially more accurate than adaptations of smoothed n-gram models commonly used in natural language processing. Shuo Chen 0008, Joshua L. Moore, Douglas R. Turnbull, Thorsten Joachims |
KDD | 2 |
| 2011 | Hashing Algorithms for Large-Scale LearningabstractMinwise hashing is a standard technique in the context of search for efficiently computing set similarities. The recent development of b-bit minwise hashing provides a substantial improvement by storing only the lowest b bits of each hashed value. In this paper, we demonstrate that b-bit minwise hashing can be naturally integrated with linear learning algorithms such as linear SVM and logistic regression, to solve large-scale and high-dimensional statistical learning tasks, especially when the data do not fit in memory. We compare $b$-bit minwise hashing with the Count-Min (CM) and Vowpal Wabbit (VW) algorithms, which have essentially the same variances as random projections. Our theoretical and empirical comparisons illustrate that b-bit minwise hashing is significantly more accurate (at the same storage cost) than VW (and random projections) for binary data. Ping Li 0001, Anshumali Shrivastava, Joshua L. Moore, Arnd Christian König |
NIPS | 3 |