Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Glen Debard

dblp:88/11110 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-0195-4848ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 56% Image recognition and object detection · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-camera tracking
multi-view multi-human tracking
0.212016
Scalable Semi-Automatic Annotation for Multi-Camera Person Tracking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object labeling
semi-automatic object labeling
0.212016
Scalable Semi-Automatic Annotation for Multi-Camera Person Tracking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
tracking evaluation
0.112016
Scalable Semi-Automatic Annotation for Multi-Camera Person Tracking · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human verification · 0.2consensus tracking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Scalable Semi-Automatic Annotation for Multi-Camera Person Tracking
abstract
This paper proposes a generic methodology for semi-automatic generation of reliable position annotations for evaluating multi-camera people-trackers on large video datasets. Most of the annotation data is computed automatically, by estimating a consensus tracking result from multiple existing trackers and people detectors and classifying it as either reliable or not. A small subset of the data, composed of tracks with insufficient reliability is verified by a human using a simple binary decision task, a process faster than marking the correct person position. The proposed framework is generic and can handle additional trackers. We present results on a dataset of approximately 6 hours captured by 4 cameras, featuring a person in a holiday flat, performing activities such as walking, cooking, eating, cleaning, and watching TV. When aiming for a tracking accuracy of 60cm, 80% of all video frames are automatically annotated. The annotations for the remaining 20% of the frames were added after human verification of an automatically selected subset of data. This involved about 2.4 hours of manual labour. According to a subsequent comprehensive visual inspection to judge the annotation procedure, we found 99% of the automatically annotated frames to be correct. We provide guidelines on how to apply the proposed methodology to new datasets. We also provide an exploratory study for the multi-target case, applied on existing and new benchmark video sequences.
Jorge Oswaldo Niño Castañeda, Andrés Frias-Velázquez, Nyan Bo Bo, Maarten Slembrouck, Junzhi Guan, Glen Debard, Bart Vanrumste, Tinne Tuytelaars, Wilfried Philips
IEEE Trans. Image Process.6