Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Valerie Daggett
dblp:88/2080
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-5116-6102ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 58% Computational science and engineering · 42% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
scientific visualization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | DIVE: a data intensive visualization engine · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › protein domain identification
protein domain classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary · Bioinform. 2011 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | DIVE: a data intensive visualization engine · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein dynamics
protein dynamics analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | DIVE: a data intensive visualization engine · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein folding |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
data-intensive visualization · 0.2consensus analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | DIVE: a data intensive visualization engineabstractAbstract Summary: Modern scientific investigation is generating increasingly larger datasets, yet analyzing these data with current tools is challenging. DIVE is a software framework intended to facilitate big data analysis and reduce the time to scientific insight. Here, we present features of the framework and demonstrate DIVE’s application to the Dynameomics project, looking specifically at two proteins. Availability and implementation: Binaries and documentation are available at http://www.dynameomics.org/DIVE/DIVESetup.exe. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Dennis Bromley, Steven J. Rysavy, Robert Su, Rudesh D. Toofanny, Tom Schmidlin, Valerie Daggett |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2012 | Protein simulation data in the relational model
Andrew M. Simms, Valerie Daggett |
J. Supercomput. | 2 |
| 2011 | Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionaryabstractMOTIVATION: The discovery of new protein folds is a relatively rare occurrence even as the rate of protein structure determination increases. This rarity reinforces the concept of folds as reusable units of structure and function shared by diverse proteins. If the folding mechanism of proteins is largely determined by their topology, then the folding pathways of members of existing folds could encompass the full set used by globular protein domains. RESULTS: We have used recent versions of three common protein domain dictionaries (SCOP, CATH and Dali) to generate a consensus domain dictionary (CDD). Surprisingly, 40% of the metafolds in the CDD are not composed of autonomous structural domains, i.e. they are not plausible independent folding units. This finding has serious ramifications for bioinformatics studies mining these domain dictionaries for globular protein properties. However, our main purpose in deriving this CDD was to generate an updated CDD to choose targets for MD simulation as part of our dynameomics effort, which aims to simulate the native and unfolding pathways of representatives of all globular protein consensus folds (metafolds). Consequently, we also compiled a list of representative protein targets of each metafold in the CDD. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This domain dictionary is available at www.dynameomics.org. R. Dustin Schaeffer, Amanda L. Jonsson, Andrew M. Simms, Valerie Daggett |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2011 | Implementation of 3D spatial indexing and compression in a large-scale molecular dynamics simulation database for rapid atomic contact detectionabstractBACKGROUND: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer the ability to observe the dynamics and interactions of both whole macromolecules and individual atoms as a function of time. Taken in context with experimental data, atomic interactions from simulation provide insight into the mechanics of protein folding, dynamics, and function. The calculation of atomic interactions or contacts from an MD trajectory is computationally demanding and the work required grows exponentially with the size of the simulation system. We describe the implementation of a spatial indexing algorithm in our multi-terabyte MD simulation database that significantly reduces the run-time required for discovery of contacts. The approach is applied to the Dynameomics project data. Spatial indexing, also known as spatial hashing, is a method that divides the simulation space into regular sized bins and attributes an index to each bin. Since, the calculation of contacts is widely employed in the simulation field, we also use this as the basis for testing compression of data tables. We investigate the effects of compression of the trajectory coordinate tables with different options of data and index compression within MS SQL SERVER 2008. RESULTS: Our implementation of spatial indexing speeds up the calculation of contacts over a 1 nanosecond (ns) simulation window by between 14% and 90% (i.e., 1.2 and 10.3 times faster). For a 'full' simulation trajectory (51 ns) spatial indexing reduces the calculation run-time between 31 and 81% (between 1.4 and 5.3 times faster). Compression resulted in reduced table sizes but resulted in no significant difference in the total execution time for neighbour discovery. The greatest compression (~36%) was achieved using page level compression on both the data and indexes. CONCLUSIONS: The spatial indexing scheme significantly decreases the time taken to calculate atomic contacts and could be applied to other multidimensional neighbor discovery problems. The speed up enables on-the-fly calculation and visualization of contacts and rapid cross simulation analysis for knowledge discovery. Using page compression for the atomic coordinate tables and indexes saves ~36% of disk space without any significant decrease in calculation time and should be considered for other non-transactional databases in MS SQL SERVER 2008. Rudesh D. Toofanny, Andrew M. Simms, David A. C. Beck, Valerie Daggett |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |