Federated learning (FL) is a decentralized machine learning approach where independent learners process data privately. Its goal is to create a robust and accurate model by aggregating and retraining local models over multiple rounds. However, FL faces challenges regarding data heterogeneity and model aggregation effectiveness. In order to simulate real-world data, researchers use methods for data partitioning that transform a dataset designated for centralized learning into a group of sub-datasets suitable for distributed machine learning with different data heterogeneity. In this paper, we study the currently popular data partitioning techniques and visualize their main disadvantages: the lack of precision in the data diversity, which leads to unreliable heterogeneity indexes, and the inability to incrementally challenge the FL algorithms. To resolve this problem, we propose a method that leverages entropy and symmetry to construct ’the most challenging’ and controllable data distributions with gradual difficulty. We introduce a metric to measure data heterogeneity among the learning agents and a transformation technique that divides any dataset into splits with precise data diversity. Through a comparative study, we demonstrate the superiority of our method over existing FL data partitioning approaches, showcasing its potential to challenge model aggregation algorithms. Experimental results indicate that our approach gradually challenges the FL strategies, and the models trained on FedSym distributions are more distinct.

We transfer a key idea from the field of sentiment analysis to a new domain: community question answering (cQA). The cQA task we are interested in is the following: given a question and a thread of comments, we want to re-rank the comments, so that the ones that are good answers to the question would be ranked higher than the bad ones. We notice that good vs. bad comments use specific vocabulary and that one can often predict the goodness/badness of a comment even ignoring the question, based on the comment contents only. This leads us to the idea to build a good/bad polarity lexicon as an analogy to the positive/negative sentiment polarity lexicons, commonly used in sentiment analysis. In particular, we use pointwise mutual information in order to build large-scale goodness polarity lexicons in a semi-supervised manner starting with a small number of initial seeds. The evaluation results show an improvement of 0.7 MAP points absolute over a very strong baseline, and state-of-the art performance on SemEval-2016 Task 3.