VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eric Lindbloom
dblp:88/3801
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | The Weighted Random Test-Pattern Generator · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | The Weighted Random Test-Pattern Generator · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › random testing
weighted random pattern testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | The Weighted Random Test-Pattern Generator · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical random sequence generation · 0.0heuristic weighting · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Fault Detection Effectiveness of Weighted Random PatternsabstractPerformance results are given for use of a weighted random pattern test generator, WRP, on ten benchmark designs. Deterministic (DET) and WRP tests created for single stuck faults are compared in their ability to detect shorts and transition faults. The WRP is able to generate a test for all the single stuck faults detected with a state-of-the-art deterministic pattern generator; WRP is highly efficient in CPU time required for full stuck fault test pattern generation; both DET and WRP achieved high net-to-net shorts fault coverage on a sample of ten designs; and WRP had significantly higher ( approximately=11%) transition fault coverage than obtained with DET for the same sample.> John A. Waicukauski, Eric Lindbloom |
ITC | 2 |
| 1986 | Transition Fault Simulation by Parallel Pattern Single Fault Propagation
John A. Waicukauski, Eric Lindbloom, Vijay S. Iyengar, Barry K. Rosen |
ITC | 2 |
| 1985 | A Statistical Calculation of Fault Detection Probabilities By Fast Fault Simulation
John A. Waicukauski, Eric Lindbloom, Edward B. Eichelberger, Donato O. Forlenza, Timothy McCarthy |
ITC | 2 |
| 1983 | An LSSD Pseudo Random Pattern Test System
Franco Motika, John A. Waicukauski, Edward B. Eichelberger, Eric Lindbloom |
ITC | 4 |
| 1975 | The Weighted Random Test-Pattern GeneratorabstractA heuristic method for generating large-scale integration (LSI) test patterns is described. In particular, this paper presents a technique for generating statistically random sequences to test complex logic circuits. The algorithms used to obtain a set of tests by means of weighted logic signal variations are included. Several techniques for assigning these weights and for varying them are discussed on the basis of the primary algorithm. Also described is a means of obtaining a minimal number of test patterns. This approach has proved successful in obtaining fault-detecting patterns. H. Daniel Schnurmann, Eric Lindbloom, Robert G. Carpenter |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |