Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Earl C. Van Horn

dblp:88/5262 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › language implementation
abstract machines
0.011967
Three criteria for designing computing systems to facilitate debugging · SOSP 1967

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design criteria · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 Software evolution using the SEER data base
abstract
Software quality improvement and cost reduction are the results expected from better communication among the people who work on a software system. SEER supports communication about a target system during the target's entire life cycle, beginning in the early stages of design, by providing access to a data base of information about the target. SEER is based on the observation that software evolution, i.e., the modification of inservice software, is becoming the dominant aspect of software engineering. SEER does not yet exist, but its functions are being defined and evaluated with the aid of a "software breadboard". An extended example of SEER use is presented, together with a description of the user's view of the SEER data base and a summary of some advanced functions possible within the SEER framework.
Earl C. Van Horn
COMPSAC1
1967 Three criteria for designing computing systems to facilitate debugging
abstract
The designer of a computing system should adopt explicit criteria for accepting or rejecting proposed system features. Three possible criteria of this kind are input recordability, input specifiability, and asychronous reproducibility of output. These criteria imply that a user can, if he desires, either know or control all of the influences affecting the content and extent of his computer's output. To define the scope of the criteria, the notion of an abstract machine of a programming language and the notion of a virtual computer are explained. Examples of applications of the criteria concern the reading of a time-of-day clock, the assignment of capability indices, and memory reading protection in multiprogrammed systems.
Earl C. Van Horn
SOSP1