Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. R. Campos

dblp:88/7143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 67% Geometric modeling and processing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › acoustic simulation
digital waveguide mesh
0.112005
On the Computational Efficiency of Different Waveguide Mesh Topologies for Room Acoustic Simulation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh processing
mesh connectivity
0.112005
On the Computational Efficiency of Different Waveguide Mesh Topologies for Room Acoustic Simulation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005
Audio and music processing › room acoustics
room acoustics simulation
0.112005
On the Computational Efficiency of Different Waveguide Mesh Topologies for Room Acoustic Simulation · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

waveguide modeling · 0.1dispersion compensation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 On the Computational Efficiency of Different Waveguide Mesh Topologies for Room Acoustic Simulation
abstract
Room acoustic simulation using digital waveguide modeling requires three-dimensional waveguide meshes in order to represent fully the acoustic properties of the space. This paper presents a systematic analysis of four mesh topologies suggested in the literature: rectilinear, tetrahedral, cubic close-packed and octahedral. These mesh structures are compared from the standpoint of computational efficiency, bearing in mind specific issues that are important for room acoustic simulation. Each mesh topology offers a different compromise between spatial resolution, bandwidth, dispersion characteristics (including suitability for the application of dispersion-compensation techniques), computation time, memory requirements and implementation complexity.
G. R. Campos, David M. Howard 0001
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1