Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clarence L. Coates
dblp:89/1268 · also C. L. Coates
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 13 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
10 papers |
Electronic design automation · 61% Integrated circuit design · 31% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 4% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 70% Image recognition and object detection · 30% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
threshold logic |
0.0 | 7 | 1969 | Logic Hazards in Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 Minimal Multiplexed Threshold Gate Realizations · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 DONUT: A Threshold Gate Computer · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.0 | 6 | 1969 | Realization of Sequential Machines with Threshold Elements · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969 Logic Hazards in Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 Realization of Logical Functions by a Network of Threshold Components with Specified Sensitivity · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 2 | 1974 | Tessellation Aspect of Combinational Cellular Array Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974 Decimal Numbers for Checking Summability · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1966 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Visual Learning from Multiple Views · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Visual Learning from Multiple Views · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
view-based object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Visual Learning from Multiple Views · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
cellular array testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1974 | Tessellation Aspect of Combinational Cellular Array Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974 |
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.0 | 3 | 1969 | Logic Hazards in Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 Decimal Numbers for Checking Summability · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1966 Realization of Sequential Machines with Threshold Elements · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1974 | Tessellation Aspect of Combinational Cellular Array Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
threshold logic synthesis |
0.0 | 4 | 1964 | Realization of Logical Functions by a Network of Threshold Components with Specified Sensitivity · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963 A Realization Procedure for Threshold Gate Networks · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963 A Simplified Procedure for the Realization of Linearly-Separable Switching Functions · IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1962 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
state assignment |
0.0 | 1 | 1969 | Realization of Sequential Machines with Threshold Elements · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › object representation
3d object description |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Visual Learning from Multiple Views · IEEE Trans. Computers 1975 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant design
fault-tolerant circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | Minimal Multiplexed Threshold Gate Realizations · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › asynchronous circuit synthesis
hazard elimination |
0.0 | 1 | 1968 | Logic Hazards in Threshold Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1968 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
sequential circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | On the Structure of Realizations Using Flip-Flop Memory Elements · Inf. Control. 1967 |
Automata and formal languages › finite automata › sequential machines
sequential circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 1967 | On the Structure of Realizations Using Flip-Flop Memory Elements · Inf. Control. 1967 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
combinational logic |
0.0 | 1 | 1966 | Decimal Numbers for Checking Summability · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1966 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
logic verification |
0.0 | 1 | 1966 | Decimal Numbers for Checking Summability · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1966 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neural computing
threshold gate networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1963 | A Realization Procedure for Threshold Gate Networks · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1963 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prime tessellation · 0.0feature mapping · 0.0composite tessellation · 0.0threshold gate realization · 0.0redundant gate addition · 0.0range theorem · 0.0prime implicant realization · 0.0partition theory · 0.0linear separability · 0.0function tree · 0.0decimal number representation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | Visual Learning from Multiple ViewsabstractAn algorithm is presented in which a computer is visually shown a sequence of views of a solid planar object as the object is rotated in space. The computer automatically forms a three-dimensional description of the object. The description consists of a deterministic description of the object's surfaces and how they are interconnected to form the object, along with a measure of each surface's shape which is invariant to three-dimensional rotation. From this self-learned model of the object, the object can later be recognized from any viewing angle. The basis of the algorithm is the ability of the program to determine in a specific visual view: "What do I see now that I have seen before?" This is accomplished by generating two sets of mappings of one object description to another object description. Stephen A. Underwood, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1974 | Tessellation Aspect of Combinational Cellular Array TestingabstractThis paper introduces procedures which enable one to settle the tessellation problem for the class of combinational cellular arrays with each cell having a binary horizontal input and a binary vertical input. Where all input combinations are applicable to all cells in the array in this class, the necessary number of tests is obtained from necessary prime as well as composite tessellations. Chia-Hsiaing Sung, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1972 | Feedback in Sequential Machine RealizationsabstractIn this paper we study feedback in sequential machines that are implemented with trigger or set-reset flip-flop memory elements. A method is given for determining when a machine can be implemented with either trigger or set-reset flip-flop memory elements where the feedback in the machine is given by a Boolean function f. Several results are presented that compare the feedback when a machine is implemented with different memory elements. It is shown that if a sequential machine can be implemented with unit delay memory elements with feedback function f, then it can be realized with set-reset flip-flop with the same feedback function f. For completely specified machines, it is shown that if a machine implemented with trigger flip-flop has no feedback, then the some machine implemented with unit delays will have feedback. Conversely, if an implementation with unit delays has no feedback, then an implementation with trigger flip-flops will have feedback. Charles A. Harlow, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1971 | Inessential Errors in Sequential MachinesabstractHartmanis and Stearns defined the concept of an inessential error in their study of errors in sequential machines and represented such errors by means of an error partition Π E. Although they showed that ΠE could not be determined using only the usual partition pair algebras, they did not provide a means by which it could be determined. The purpose of this note is to develop an algorithm for the determination of ΠE for a given machine. Charles A. Harlow, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1969 | Realization of Sequential Machines with Threshold ElementsabstractThe state assignment problem for finite-state sequential machines is examined in the context of threshold logic. An algorithm is developed for assigning binary codes to the states, inputs, and outputs so that the state variable and output variable functions satisfy the necessary condition of 2-assumability that they be linearly separable. The algorithm deals with 2-block partitions by which the assignments are made. First those partitions which cannot be used are computed. For each of the remaining partitions, a list is compiled of those partitions of which one must be used if the given partition is used. Finally, a method is given for constructing the sets of partitions satisfying these constraints and having zero product. Code assignments made by these partition sets will induce 2-asummable functions. Frank O. Hadlock, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1968 | Minimal Multiplexed Threshold Gate RealizationsabstractAbstract—In this paper, methods are presented for designing error-correcting capabilities into threshold gate networks so that the logic gates themselves will correct errors of other gates in the network . In all but one of these methods, a given realization is modified by the addition of redundant gates to obtain an error-correcting network . Realizations are obtained by the first three methods which require that an error of any given number of gates be corrected by the gates immediately following those which are in error. This is the multiplexed realization. In the remaining methods, this requirement is replaced by the requirement that a given number of errors be corrected by some gates in the network. Errors of the output gate are not corrected. The last section discusses a method for obtaining an error-correcting network directly from the Boolean function to be realized. J. D. Bargainer Jr., Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1968 | Logic Hazards in Threshold NetworksabstractAbstract—This paper is concerned with the study of logic hazards in threshold gate networks. Eichelberger has proved that logic hazards are not present in a sum-of-product (product-of-sum) realization which realizes all of the 1(0) prime implicants of the given Boolean function.[2]Logic gates of the AND or NOR (OR or NAND) variety realize single l(0) prime implicants; therefore, a gate is required for each 1(0) prime implicant to be realized, and the problem of eliminating logic hazards is straightforward. A. Bart Howe, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1967 | On the Structure of Realizations Using Flip-Flop Memory Elements
Charles A. Harlow, Clarence L. Coates |
Inf. Control. | 2 |
| 1966 | Decimal Numbers for Checking SummabilityabstractAssume that our technology uses "black boxes" that may be described by a planar figure. (See Fig. 1.) Each "box" has a finite number of inputs ordered in the manner shown in Fig. 1, from top to bottom on the left-hand side of the "box," and one output coming out of the right-hand side of the "box." The output is some function of the input variables. For the purpose of our discussion, the variables may be continuous or discrete or of any nature whatsoever, and each "box" may have any number of inputs. J. D. Bargainer Jr., Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 2 |
| 1964 | DONUT: A Threshold Gate ComputerabstractDuring the past few years there has been a considerable amount of literature concerned with the realization of threshold logic. However, there are a number of questions concerning such factors as sensitivity and component savings which cannot be completely answered by such theoretical studies. DONUT (Digitally Operated Network Using Thresholds) is a small general purpose digital computer which was designed and constructed to evaluate the feasibility of using threshold gates as the basic logical element. Exclusive of memory the computer consists of about 500 threshold gates. The design was carried out for five different values of component tolerances and the tightest tolerance version was constructed. Component savings for the constructed machine are about a factor of four compared with the loosest tolerance NOR gate realization. Experiments were made to verify that the power supply and logical voltages were within tolerances in the system environment. Clarence L. Coates, Philip M. Lewis |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 1 |
| 1963 | A Realization Procedure for Threshold Gate NetworksabstractOne engineering parameter of importance in the realization of threshold gate networks is the tolerance which must be placed on the coefficients and threshold of the individual components. A previous paper gives a realization procedure which allows this tolerance to be controlled. The present paper gives an alternate realization procedure which also allows the tolerance to be controlled, but which is somewhat different in its application. The new procedure can be considered to be a generalization of an earlier procedure for the single-element realization problem. The function is first decomposed using a generalization of the function tree and then reconstructed using a generalization of the range theorem plus some additional simplification theorems. Clarence L. Coates, Philip M. Lewis |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 1 |
| 1963 | Is Switching Theory Mathematics or Engineering?
Philip M. Lewis, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 2 |
| 1963 | Realization of Logical Functions by a Network of Threshold Components with Specified SensitivityabstractIn the realization of a logical function by a network of threshold components, one important engineering parameter is the tolerances which must be placed on the coefficients and threshold of the individual components. For threshold gates in which the logical ``zero'' corresponds to a constant signal of zero value and in which the coefficients are all positive or all negative, these tolerances are functions only of the gap boundaries of the map realized by the component. A set of theorems is presented that define ``algebraic-like'' operations which provide a means for performing a sequence of symbolic operations on the desired logical function whereby the latter is transformed into a description of a network of threshold components which is its realization. Using these theorems a procedure is given for realizing an arbitrary logical function as a network of threshold components with specified sensitivity. Philip M. Lewis, Clarence L. Coates |
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 2 |
| 1962 | A Simplified Procedure for the Realization of Linearly-Separable Switching FunctionsabstractA previous paper gives a procedure for the testing and realization of linearly-separable switching functions, i.e., functions which can be realized by a single threshold component. That procedure can be considerably simplified, particularly when the given function is symmetric in sets of two or more variables. The simplifications arise due to a reduction of the number of functions in the function tree in view of the coefficient ordering. Although this procedure was derived with the aim of reducing the amount of computation below that required for straightforward solution of the simultaneous inequalities that define the problem, the resulting method has some interesting relationships to that due to Winder. Clarence L. Coates, Roger B. Kirchner, Philip M. Lewis |
IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. | 1 |