Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fang Zhou 0002

dblp:89/1615-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 77% Graph learning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112011
Compression of weighted graphs · KDD 2011
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph representation
graph compression
0.112011
Compression of weighted graphs · KDD 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › formation control
connectivity maintenance
0.112010
Network Simplification with Minimal Loss of Connectivity · ICDM 2010
Visualization and visual analytics
graph visualization
0.012011
Compression of weighted graphs · KDD 2011
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph analytics
graph mining
0.012010
Network Simplification with Minimal Loss of Connectivity · ICDM 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

approximation error minimization · 0.4path quality function · 0.1lower bounds · 0.1edge pruning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Summarisation of weighted networks
abstract
Networks often contain implicit structure. We introduce novel problems and methods that look for structure in networks, by grouping nodes into supernodes and edges to superedges, and then make this structure visible to the user in a smaller generalised network. This task of finding generalisations of nodes and edges is formulated as ‘network Summarisation’. We propose models and algorithms for networks that have weights on edges, on nodes or on both, and study three new variants of the network summarisation problem. In edge-based weighted network summarisation, the summarised network should preserve edge weights as well as possible. A wider class of settings is considered in path-based weighted network summarisation, where the resulting summarised network should preserve longer range connectivities between nodes. Node-based weighted network summarisation in turn allows weights also on nodes and summarisation aims to preserve more information related to high weight nodes. We study theoretical properties of these problems and show them to be NP-hard. We propose a range of heuristic generalisation algorithms with different trade-offs between complexity and quality of the result. Comprehensive experiments on real data show that weighted networks can be summarised efficiently with relatively little error.
Fang Zhou 0002, Hannu Toivonen
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.1
2011 Compression of weighted graphs
abstract
We propose to compress weighted graphs (networks), motivated by the observation that large networks of social, biological, or other relations can be complex to handle and visualize. In the process also known as graph simplification, nodes and (unweighted) edges are grouped to supernodes and superedges, respectively, to obtain a smaller graph. We propose models and algorithms for weighted graphs. The interpretation (i.e. decompression) of a compressed, weighted graph is that a pair of original nodes is connected by an edge if their supernodes are connected by one, and that the weight of an edge is approximated to be the weight of the superedge. The compression problem now consists of choosing supernodes, superedges, and superedge weights so that the approximation error is minimized while the amount of compression is maximized.
Hannu Toivonen, Fang Zhou 0002, Aleksi Hartikainen, Atte Hinkka
KDD2
2010 Network Simplification with Minimal Loss of Connectivity
abstract
We propose a novel problem to simplify weighted graphs by pruning least important edges from them. Simplified graphs can be used to improve visualization of a network, to extract its main structure, or as a pre-processing step for other data mining algorithms. We define a graph connectivity function based on the best paths between all pairs of nodes. Given the number of edges to be pruned, the problem is then to select a subset of edges that best maintains the overall graph connectivity. Our model is applicable to a wide range of settings, including probabilistic graphs, flow graphs and distance graphs, since the path quality function that is used to find best paths can be defined by the user. We analyze the problem, and give lower bounds for the effect of individual edge removal in the case where the path quality function has a natural recursive property. We then propose a range of algorithms and report on experimental results on real networks derived from public biological databases. The results show that a large fraction of edges can be removed quite fast and with minimal effect on the overall graph connectivity. A rough semantic analysis of the removed edges indicates that few important edges were removed, and that the proposed approach could be a valuable tool in aiding users to view or explore weighted graphs.
Fang Zhou 0002, Sébastien Mahler, Hannu Toivonen
ICDM1
2010 A Framework for Path-Oriented Network Simplification
Hannu Toivonen, Sébastien Mahler, Fang Zhou 0002
IDA3