Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rohayu Bt Paidi

dblp:89/2128 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 67% Distributed computing theory · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › symbolic model checking
BDD-based verification
0.012001
Symbolic Model Checking for Self-Stabilizing Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed computing theory
self-stabilization
0.012001
Symbolic Model Checking for Self-Stabilizing Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking
0.012001
Symbolic Model Checking for Self-Stabilizing Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012001
Symbolic Model Checking for Self-Stabilizing Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordered binary decision diagrams · 0.1SMV · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Symbolic Model Checking for Self-Stabilizing Algorithms
abstract
A distributed system is said to be self-stabilizing if it converges to safe states regardless of its initial state. In this paper we present our results of using symbolic model checking to verify distributed algorithms against the self-stabilizing property. In general, the most difficult problem with model checking is state explosion; it is especially serious in verifying the self-stabilizing property, since it requires the examination of all possible initial states. So far applying model checking to self-stabilizing algorithms has not been successful due to the problem of state explosion. In order to overcome this difficulty, we propose to use symbolic model checking for this purpose. Symbolic model checking is a verification method which uses Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams (OBDDs) to compactly represent state spaces. Unlike other model checking techniques, this method has the advantage that most of its computations do not depend on the initial states. We show how to verify the correctness of algorithms by means of SMV, a well-known symbolic model checker. By applying the proposed approach to several algorithms in the literature, we demonstrate empirically that the state spaces of self-stabilizing algorithms can be represented by OBDDs very efficiently. Through these case studies, we also demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed approach in detecting errors.
Tatsuhiro Tsuchiya, Shin'ichi Nagano, Rohayu Bt Paidi, Tohru Kikuno
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3